Ex contradictio states that you can follow anything from a contradiction. But is it possible to follow one of the conjuncts itself?
$$ (p \land \neg p) \to p $$
Is that valid?
Ex contradictio states that you can follow anything from a contradiction. But is it possible to follow one of the conjuncts itself?
$$ (p \land \neg p) \to p $$
Is that valid?
Since what you are asking about is trivially true, I suspect that you are worried about something else. In a proof by contradiction, once you reach a contradiction you don't move on from the contradiction itself, deducing additional consequences of it (which include both $p$ and $\neg p$, so not very helpful in deciding between the two). Instead, you step back and reject the assumption that got you to that point in the first place.