does long division method or the other manual algorithms that are used to calculate square root of any number , gives the exact value of square root of any number OR they just approximate it as accurately as they can ? Please guide me.
2026-03-31 11:33:54.1774956834
does the long division method gives the exact value of square root of any non perfect square natural number?
128 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in IRRATIONAL-NUMBERS
- Convergence of a rational sequence to a irrational limit
- $\alpha$ is an irrational number. Is $\liminf_{n\rightarrow\infty}n\{ n\alpha\}$ always positive?
- Is this : $\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{\cdots}}}}}$ irrational number?
- ls $\sqrt{2}+\sqrt{3}$ the only sum of two irrational which close to $\pi$?
- Find an equation where all 'y' is always irrational for all integer values of x
- Is a irrational number still irrational when we apply some mapping to its decimal representation?
- Density of a real subset $A$ such that $\forall (a,b) \in A^2, \ \sqrt{ab} \in A$
- Proof of irrationality
- Is there an essential difference between Cartwright's and Niven's proofs of the irrationality of $\pi$?
- Where am I making a mistake in showing that countability isn't a thing?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Any numeric method will give an approximation to the square root. As the decimal expansion goes on forever, you can't write down an exact value. Generally you can go as long as you want to get a value that is as accurate as you want, but you can't get the exact value. There is no way to write the number that is $\sqrt 2$ exactly unless you just write $\sqrt 2$ or some equivalent expression. Any of the numeric methods will give you something like $1.414213$, which is not exact.