I have been studying basics of descriptive set theory lately. In the lecture notes I follow (sadly, the notes are written in Czech), there is the following definition:
Let X be a topological space. We say that a system $(G_\beta)_{\beta<\alpha}$ of open sets is a HK (Hausdorff-Kuratowski) scheme if $\alpha < \omega_1$, $G_\gamma\subseteq G_\beta$ whenever $\gamma\leq\beta < \alpha$, $G_\lambda =\bigcup\limits_{\beta < \lambda}G_\beta$ whenever $\lambda < \alpha$ is a limit ordinal.
My question is whether it's true that $X = \bigcup\limits_{\beta < \alpha}G_\beta$. I observed that for every $x\in\bigcup\limits_{\beta < \alpha}G_\beta$ there exists the smallest ordinal $\beta < \alpha$ such that $x\in G_\beta$ and this ordinal can't be a limit one. However, the notes claim that it follows that a HK system does cover the whole space. There is no restriction on $X$ in the definition but we may assume that $X$ is a polish space if needed.
My knowledge of set theory is pretty shallow (not speaking of intuition) so I might be overlooking something trivial, but I simply can't see why this should be true.
Thank you for any help!
It seems that $X=\bigcup_{\beta<\alpha}G_\beta$ does not follow. Indeed, we can replace $X$ with $X\sqcup X$ and keep the $G_\beta$.