Consider the quantum free Hamiltonian $H_0 =-\frac{d^2}{dx^2}$ (the Laplacian on the real line). I want to show that it is (essentially) self-adjoint in its domain of definition. The usual approach works with the Fourier transform and proceeds to show that $H_0$ is unitarily equivalent to a multiplication operator. The domain of definition is taken to be those $\psi\in L^2(\mathbb{R})$ such that $-\psi''\in L^2(\mathbb{R})$ in the weak (distributional) sense. My question is: is it possible to prove self-adjointness without resorting to Fourier and distributions, just by using Hilbert space techniques?
2026-03-28 04:42:46.1774672966
Domain of the quantum free Hamiltonian in 1D
322 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-THEORY
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Confusion about relationship between operator $K$-theory and topological $K$-theory
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- hyponormal operators
- a positive matrix of operators
- If $S=(S_1,S_2)$ hyponormal, why $S_1$ and $S_2$ are hyponormal?
- Closed kernel of a operator.
- Why is $\lambda\mapsto(\lambda\textbf{1}-T)^{-1}$ analytic on $\rho(T)$?
- Show that a sequence of operators converges strongly to $I$ but not by norm.
- Is the dot product a symmetric or anti-symmetric operator?
Related Questions in QUANTUM-MECHANICS
- Is there a book on the purely mathematical version of perturbation theory?
- Matrix differential equation and matrix exponential
- "Good" Linear Combinations of a Perturbed Wave Function
- Necessary condition for Hermician lin operators
- What is a symplectic form of the rotation group SO(n)
- Why is $\textbf{J}$ called angular momentum?(Quantum)
- How does the quantumstate evolve?
- Differential equation $au''(x)+b\frac{u(x)}{x}+Eu=0$
- How to model this system of $^{238}\,U$ atoms?
- Discrete spectra of generators of compact Lie group
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let's try to show that the closure of a "smaller" symmetric operator is the desired self-adjoint operator. (A self-adjoint operator is always closed.) Take $\Delta = H_0$ just on the domain of the test-functions $D(\Delta) = \mathcal{C}_0^\infty$ (dense in $L^2$) as a starting point. It is clearly symmetric as twice partial integration shows. Now every symmetric operator is closable, i.e. it has a smallest closed extension $\overline{\Delta}$ on some larger domain $D(\overline{\Delta}) \supset D(\Delta)$.
To construct the closure operator take all $x \in L^2$ s.t. a sequence $\{x_n\} \subset D(\Delta)$ that converges to $x$ (in $L^2$-norm) also has $\{\Delta x_n\}$ converging to some $y \in L^2$ (in $L^2$-norm). We set $\overline{\Delta}x=y$ and thus define the extension. (This is unique, i.e. does not depend on the selected sequence, because the operator is symmetric.)
To get the domain of the closure operator we need to collect all these $x$. Putting the two convergences together it says we take all $x$ that have correponding sequences $\{x_n\} \subset D(\Delta)$ converging to $x$ but w.r.t to the stronger norm $\|x\|_\Delta = \|x\|_2 + \|\Delta x\|_2$. (This is called the graph norm of $\Delta$.) But the closure of the test functions w.r.t. to this graph norm is just the Sobolev space $H^2$ of twice weakly (not distributionally) differentiable functions. So this is our new domain $D(\overline\Delta) = H^2$ and we suspect this is the right domain for a self-adjoint operator.
For self-adjointness we need $D(\overline\Delta) = D(\overline\Delta^*)$ so the domains of the operator and its adjoint must coincide. The domain of the adjoint is defined as $$ D(\overline\Delta^*) = \{ x\in L^2 | \exists y \in L^2 \,\forall z \in D(\overline\Delta) : \langle \overline\Delta z,x \rangle = \langle z,y \rangle \}. $$
But this is just the definition for twice weakly differentiation with the additional condition that the second (weak) derivative $y$ is still in $L^2$ (because we are not using test functions $z$). So $x \in L^2$ and $y = \overline\Delta x \in L^2$ and thus $$ D(\overline\Delta^*) = H^2 = D(\overline\Delta) $$ $\Box$