This book (proof of Theorem 3.2) in chapter 3.1 claims click me that an easy computation shows that $$[f,[f, - \Delta]] = -2 |\nabla f|^2.$$ where $[.,.]$ denotes the commutator. Unfortunately, I really don't see how one gets this easily out of it. Besides, the equation below this one is fairly direct to me.
Does anybody have an idea.
Note that the commutator acts in a way similar to the derivative, therefore, e.g. \begin{align}[f,[\partial_x^2,f]]&=[f,\partial_x\circ[\partial_x,f]+[\partial_x,f]\circ\partial_x]= [f,\partial_x\circ f_x+f_x\circ\partial_x]=\\ &=\underbrace{[f,\partial_x]}_{=-f_x}\circ f_x+\partial_x\circ\underbrace{[f,f_x]}_{=0}+\underbrace{[f,f_x]}_{=0}\circ \partial_x+f_x\underbrace{\circ[f,\partial_x]}_{=-f_x}=-2f_x^2. \end{align}