I want to prove the momentum conservation of the nonlinear Schrodinger eq. $u_t=i\Delta u + i|u|^{p-1}u$. The momentum is gives by $$ Pu=2Im \int_{R^n} \overline{u}\nabla u\ dx$$ I have read that in order to prove its conservation, de misterio multiply the eq. By $\nabla \overline{u}$, and take real part. After that, I suppose we need some integration by parts. However I am stucked with this integrals, $$\int \Delta u\nabla \overline{u}$$ I guess the real part of it must be zero, but I dont see it. Any help is welcome! Thanks in advance.
2026-02-23 01:38:40.1771810720
Doubt on momentum conservation in nonlinear schrodinger
131 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
- IBVP: Heat Equation
Related Questions in NONLINEAR-ANALYSIS
- Functions on $\mathbb{R}^n$ commuting with orthogonal transformations
- Sufficient condition for strict minimality in infinite-dimensional spaces
- Let $ \ x_1 <x_2 < ... < x_8 \ $ be the eight fixed points of $ \ G^3(x) \ $ where $ \ G(x)= 4x(1−x) \ $
- Determine the stability properties and convergence in the origin using Lyapunov Direct Method
- The motivation for defining Brouwer degree as $\deg(F,\Omega, y_0)= \sum_{x\in F^{-1}(y_0)} \operatorname{sign} J_{F(x)}$
- How are the equations of non linear data determined?
- inhomogenous Fredholm equation
- Nonlinear Sylvester-like equation
- Is the map $u\mapsto |u|^2 u$ globally or locally Lipschitz continuous in the $H_0^1$ norm?
- First order nonlinear differential inequality
Related Questions in DISPERSIVE-PDE
- The Fourier transform is unbounded from $L^{p}$ to $L^{p^{\prime}}$ when $2<p\leq \infty$?
- An asymptotic for a simple oscillatory integral
- Physical interpretation of a singular pde
- What does it really mean for a wave equation to be critical?
- Dual local smoothing and retarded local smoothing for Schrodinger equation
- An Sobolev-type inequality on $1D$ torus related to algebra properties for Sobolev spaces
- Question about schrodinger free equation
- Regularity of Solution for the Kdv equation
- Interpretation of dispersion relation
- Doubt on momentum conservation in nonlinear schrodinger
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Consider the expression $$\int \Delta u \partial_{x_j} \overline{u}\;dx$$ By integrating by parts $3$ times (twice to move the Laplacian from $u$ to $\overline{u}$, and once again to move $\partial_{x_j}$ from $\overline{u}$ to $u$), we obtain $$\int \Delta u \partial_{x_j} \overline{u}\;dx = - \int \partial_{x_j} u \Delta \overline{u}\;dx = - \overline{\int \Delta u \partial_{x_j} \overline{u}\;dx}.$$ It follows that the integral is purely imaginary, as required.