My question is simply whether the well-known formula $e^{i \theta}$ $=$ $\cos \theta$ $+$ $i \sin \theta$ a definition or there is some proof of the result.
It seems to me that the formula is a definition (as is the case with the definition of $e$ from which the definition of $e^x$ can easily be derived). But if I try to form the definition in the same manner I have to us the definition from Complex Analysis. Is there any way to prove the result without using any ideas from Complex Analysis?
In Function Theory of One Complex Variable by Robert E Greene and Steven G Krantz, they define
$$e^{iy}=\cos(y)+i\sin(y)$$
And if $x$ is real
$$e^x=\sum_{j=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^j}{j!}$$
But then they prove later that their definition isn't circular while discussing zeros of holomorphic functions. The point is, this is a "formal definition" and that's fine because you won't get any contradictions and more importantly we can (if desired) prove something else that we would normally consider an axiom. In other words, it's possible to switch the role of an axiom and a corollary as long as they are a tautology in some sense and one isn't in fact so much more fundamental.