Suppose $M$ is a type $II_{1}$ factor with trace $\tau$. Let $\lbrace p_{n}\rbrace_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be an increasing sequence of projections such that $\tau(p_{n})\rightarrow 1$. Now, let's consider $\lbrace q_{n}\rbrace_{n\geq 2}$ such that for $n\geq 2$ we define $q_{n}=p_{n}-p_{n-1}$ and finally let's consider $Q_{j}=q_{j}Mq_{j}$, for $j\geq 2$. This is the setting and I am reading a paper where now is said that is a "well-known fact" that there is a unital embedding $\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}M_{n}(\mathbb{C})\hookrightarrow Q_{j}\subset M$. Can someone explain me this well known fact ? Thank you
2026-03-27 13:19:32.1774617572
embedding of $\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ in a type $II_{1}$ factor
76 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-ALGEBRAS
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- hyponormal operators
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Identifying $C(X\times X)$ with $C(X)\otimes C(X)$
- If $A\in\mathcal{L}(E)$, why $\lim\limits_{n\to+\infty}\|A^n\|^{1/n}$ always exists?
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is $\left\lVert f_U-f_V\right\rVert_{op}\leq \left\lVert U-V\right\rVert_2$ where $f_U = A\mapsto UAU^*$?
Related Questions in VON-NEUMANN-ALGEBRAS
- An embedding from the $C(X) \rtimes_{\alpha,r}\Gamma$ into $L^{\infty}(X) \ltimes \Gamma$.
- Are atomic simple C*-algebras von Neumann algebras?
- weak operator topology convergence and the trace of spectral projections
- Reference request for the following theorem in Von Neumann algebras.
- Is the bidual of a C*-algebra isomorphic to the universal enveloping von Nemann algebra as a Banach algebra?
- von Neumann algebra
- L2 norm convergence on (bounded ball of) *-subalgebra of von Neumann algebra
- Traces on $K(H)$
- Why is $M_n(A)$ a von Neumann algebra
- Clarification on proof in Murphy's C*-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can do this in any II$_1$-factor. Note that $Q_j$ is a II$_1$-factor.
In any II$_1$-factor $M$ you can always get a sequence of pairwise orthogonal projections that add to the identity (those could be the $q_j$ in your setup). So now you want to embed $M_n(\mathbb C)\hookrightarrow q_jMq_j$. Since you are in a II$_1$-factor, you can divide $q_j$ as a sum of $n$ pairwise equivalent projections $r_1,\ldots,r_n$. Let $e_{1r}$ be a partial isometry with $e_{1k}e_{1k}^*=r_1$, $e_{1k}^*e_{1k}=r_k$. Now define $e_{kj}=e_{1k}^*e_{1j}$. It is easy to check that this elements behave like matrix units, and so you get a unital copy of $M_n(\mathbb C)$ in $q_jMq_j$.
Edit: To be more explicit. Fix a II$_1$ factor $M$. Let $\{q_n\}$ be a sequence of pairwise orthogonal projections with $\sum q_n=I$. If we apply the above to the II$_1$-factor $q_nMq_n$ we have a $*$-monomorphism $\pi_n:M_n(\mathbb C)\to q_nMq_n$ given by $$ \pi_n(a)=\sum_{k,j=1}^na_{kj}\,e^*_{1k}e_{1j}. $$ Now define $\pi:\prod_nM_n(\mathbb C)\to M$ by $$ \pi(\{a_n\})=\sum_n\pi_n(a_n). $$ This last sum converges in the two norm and it defines a $*$-monomorphism, because $\pi_n(a_n)=q_n\pi_n(a_n)q_n$ and $\sum q_n=I$.