Endomorphism is normal and idempotent iff it is an orthogonal projection.

769 Views Asked by At

I've searched for answers for this question here for some time but haven't found an applicable answer because I could only find related questions, but not this one in particular.

Suppose $V$ is a finite dimensional (real or complex) inner product space, and $f: V \rightarrow V$ an endomorphism. Then $f$ is an orthogonal projection on $im(f) = U$ iff $f$ is normal and idempotent. Here orthogonal projection means that $f(v) = u$ with the unique decomposition $v = u + u'$, where $u \in U, u' \in U^{T}$.

The first direciton is straight forward, because you immediately get an orthonormal basis of $U$, fill it up with an orthonormal basis of $U'$ and use that all these vectors are eigenvectors.

The problem is the other direction, how do I proceed here? I know that essentially I have to show that $\forall u' \in U^{T}: f(u') = 0$, because an idempotent implies identity on it's image, but I don't know where to use that $f$ is normal. I have somehow gotten an argument without using that $f$ is normal, but this one has to be wrong I guess.

Any help is appreciated!

2

There are 2 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

Let $f^*$ denote the adjoint of $f$. Let $u' \in U^\bot$. Then

$$\langle f(u'), f(u')\rangle = \langle u', f^*(f(u'))\rangle = \langle u', f(f^*(u'))\rangle = 0.$$

The second equality follows from normality, the third holds because $f(f^*(u')) \in U$ and $u' \in U^\bot$.

0
On

Being idempotent implies that $f$ is a projection, without the normality assumption. You already know it implies $f$ is the identity on its image; it follows that $v = fv + (1-f)v$ (valid for any linear map) splits $v$ into $u\in\operatorname{im} f$ and $u'\in\ker f$. (Note that $(1-f)v\in \ker f$ as $f(1-f) v = fv-f^2v = fv-fv=0$.) It follows that every element of $V$ is represented as a sum of an element of $U=\operatorname{im}f$ and $U'=\ker f$, and that $f$ sends $v$ to the former, forgetting the latter. The representation is unique because $\ker f \cap \operatorname{im} f = 0$ since if $v$ is in the image then $v=fv$, but if also in the kernel then $fv=0$.

You need the normality to conclude that the projection is orthogonal, i.e. that $U = \ker f$ and $U' = \operatorname{im} f$ are orthogonal to each other. You can get this from McFry's answer.