I need to find entropy solution for the inviscid Burgers equation $$u_{t}+uu_{x}=0$$ in $\mathbb{R}\times[0,+\infty)$ with initial condition $$u(x,0)=g(x)=-x\chi_{[a,b]}(x)$$where$\chi_{[a,b]}(x)$ stands for characteristic function of $[a,b]$, with $a,b\in\mathbb{R}$ and $a$ strictly smaller than $b$. For a given $x_{0}\in\mathbb{R}$ characteristic curve passing through $(x_{0},0)$ has the equation $$x(t)=g(x_{0})t+x_{0}$$ which means that for $x_{0}\in(-\infty,a)\cup(b,+\infty)$ characteristic curves passing through $(x_{0},0)$ have the equation $$x(t)=x_{0}$$ Characteristics that pass through $(x_{0},0)$ for $x_{0}\in[a,b]$ have the equation $$x(t)=-x_{0}t+x_{0}=x_{0}(1-t)$$ Upper relation implies that every such characteristic passes through $(0,1)$. Therefore, in triangle with vertices $(a,0)$, $(b,0)$ and $(0,1)$ we can set $u(x,t)=\frac{x}{t-1}$ ($u$ defined this way satisfies equation and initial condition). It seems to me that, in order to find entropy solution in other regions, one need to consider three cases: (i) $a\geq0$ ; (ii) $b\leq0$ and (iii) $a$ smaller than $0$ and $b$ greater than $0$. How to proceed further? I will appreciate any kind of help.
2026-03-27 22:55:16.1774652116
Entropy solution of particular inviscid Burgers equation
165 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in HYPERBOLIC-EQUATIONS
- what does mean a zero eigenvalue in a PDE?
- Solution of Burgers' equation
- Canonical form of PDE
- Introduction to characteristic surfaces and bicharacteristics
- Simple calculus
- Uniqueness and domain of dependence for wave equations.
- Goursat Problem Solution
- Method of Characteristics for traffic flow equation
- Lax-Wendroff method for linear advection - Stability analysis
- Help deriving Lax-Wendroff scheme for advection equation $u_t+c(x)u_x = 0$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is instructive to plot the characteristics for some representative choice of $a, b$ to get the intuition, where I always chose $a, b\neq 0$ to have the most general case.
Case (i), $0 \leq a < b$:
There is a lot going on, namely we have a shock forming at $x = a$ (for $a > 0$), a rarefaction fan "fanning out" at $ x = b$ and intersecting characteristics at $t=1$.
Based on the this solution for a similar problem, we can give a solution for $t \leq 1$ which is made of "base" solutions. First, tackle the rarefaction in the area between the green and orange characteristics. This can be taken straight from the books and turns out in this case to be $$ u_{\color{green}G\color{orange}O} = \begin{cases} \frac{-x}{1-t} & x \leq b - bt = b(1 -t) \\ \frac{x - b}{t} & b -bt < x \leq b \\ 0 & x > b \end{cases} $$ Let's do a quick sanity check if this is so far correct: On the left side $\big($ on curve $x = b(1-t)\big)$ we have $$\frac{-x}{1-t} = \frac{-b(1-t)}{1-t} = -b \overset{!}{=} \frac{x - b}{t} = \frac{b(1-t) - b}{t} = -b \quad \checkmark $$ and on the right $( x = b )$ we obviously have $0 = 0$. Now we have to turn our attention to the shock. The Rankine-Hugoniot condition determines the ODE for the shock curve. The left state $u_L$ is identically $0$, while the right state $u_R$ depends on current location $x$ and time $t$. Luckily, we already know the equation for this: $$u = \frac{-x}{1-t}.$$ Now we have to solve the ODE $$ \dot x_s(t) = s(t) \overset{\text{RH for Burgers}}{=} 0.5 (u_L + u_R) = 0.5 \frac{x}{t - 1}, \quad x_s(0) \overset{!}{=} a.$$ Solving this separable ODE gives (cf. this answer) $$ x_s(t) = a \sqrt{1-t}.$$ Finally we can set up the solution for $t < 1$: $$ u(x, t) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq a \sqrt{1-t} \\ \frac{-x}{1-t} & a \sqrt{1-t} < x \leq b (1 -t) \\ \frac{x - b}{t} & b -bt < x \leq b \\ 0 & b < x \end{cases}. $$ Alright, now what's happening for $t> 1$? As seen from the plot, the information from the non-trivial initial condition is only implicitly prevalent through the rarefaction fan. $($The green characteristics intersect at $t= 1)$. The outermost wave of the fan carries value $$ \widetilde{u_R}= \frac{x - b}{t}. $$ Again, we use the Rankine-Hugoniot condition to come up with the ODE for the shock: $$ \dot{\widetilde{x_s}} = 0.5\frac{\widetilde{x_s} - b}{t}, \quad \widetilde{x_s}(1) = 0. $$ The shock curve is in this case given by $$\widetilde{x_s}(t) = b (1 - \sqrt{t})$$ and the solution for $t > $ is given by $$u(x, t) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq \widetilde{x_s}(t) = b (1 -\sqrt{t}) \\ \frac{x - b}{t} & b (1 -\sqrt{t}) < x \leq b \\ 0 & x > b \end{cases} $$
For $a= 0$ you have the simplification that there is no shock for $t < 1$, you should be able to come up with a solution based on this approach and the previously mentioned solution.
Case (ii), $ a < b \leq 0$:
Now the rarefaction is between blue and green and the shock between green and orange. Essentially doing everything the same mutatis mutandis, the solution for $t < 1$ is $$ u(x, t) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq a \\ \frac{x-a}{t} & a < x \leq a(1-t) \\ \frac{-x}{1-t} & a(1-t) < x \leq b \sqrt{1-t} \\ 0 & b \sqrt{1-t} < x \end{cases}$$
For $t > 1$, $$ u(x, t) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq a \\ \frac{x-a}{t} & a < x \leq a(1 - \sqrt{t}) \\ 0 & a(1 - \sqrt{t}) < x\end{cases}$$
Case (iii) $a < 0 < b$:
Here we have two rarefactions, and no shock (for small times). For $t < 1$, $$u(x, t) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq a \\ \frac{x -a }{t} & a < x \leq a(1-t)\\ \frac{-x}{1-t} & a(1-t) < x \leq b(1-t) \\ \frac{x -b }{t} & b(1-t) < x \leq b \\ 0 & b < x \end{cases} $$
For $t > 1$, we have a shock forming from the two rarefaction waves. In this case, $$ \dot{\widehat{x_s}}(t) = 0.5 \bigg( \frac{x -a }{t} + \frac{x -b }{t} \bigg) , \quad \widehat{x_s}(1) \overset{!}{=} 0 $$ with solution $$ \widehat{x_s}(t) = 0.5 \big(a(1-t) + b(1-t)\big) $$
Thus, for $t > 1$: $$u(x, t) = \begin{cases} 0 & x \leq a \\ \frac{x -a }{t} & a < x \leq 0.5 \big(a(1-t) + b(1-t)\big) \\ \frac{x -b }{t} & 0.5 \big(a(1-t) + b(1-t)\big) < x \leq b \\ 0 & b < x \end{cases} $$