How I can prove that if $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are two $r$-dimensional continuous forms defined in an open $U\subset\mathbb{R}^n$ such that $\int_M\alpha=\int_M\beta$ for all compact $r$-dimensional submanifold with boundary $M\subset U$, then $\alpha=\beta$?
2026-04-12 18:54:53.1776020093
Equal integrals of differential forms implies equal differential forms
271 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in MANIFOLDS
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Possible condition on locally Euclidean subsets of Euclidean space to be embedded submanifold
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- "Defining a smooth structure on a topological manifold with boundary"
- On the differentiable manifold definition given by Serge Lang
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Hyperboloid is a manifold
- Integration of one-form
- The graph of a smooth map is a manifold
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-FORMS
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Integration of one-form
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- How to find 1-form for Stokes' Theorem?
- Verify the statement about external derivative.
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- form value on a vector field
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Looking at $\omega = \alpha - \beta$ it suffices to prove $\omega$ vanishes on $U$ assuming it integrates to zero on all submanifolds. Let's assume we already have the case $r=n$ figured out. Then the case $r<n$ follows immediately, since for any chart $(V,\varphi)$ of any manifold we have $$\int_{\varphi(V)}(\varphi^{-1})^*\omega = \int_V\omega = 0$$ Hence by the same logic $(\varphi^{-1})^*\omega$ integrates to zero on any open subset of $\varphi(V)\subseteq \mathbb R^r$, so (by what we haven't proved yet) $(\varphi^{-1})^*\omega=0$ on $\varphi(V)$ and thus $\omega = 0$ on $V$ when restricted to input vectors in $T_pV$ (meaning $\omega=0$ as a $r$-form on $V$ and not $U$).
So for any point $p \in U$ and $v_1,\dots, v_r \in T_p\mathbb R^n$ we can take an $r$-dim manifold such that $v_1,\dots, v_r \in T_p M$ (for example, an affine subspace) and using some chart of it around $p$ it shows that $\omega_p(v_1,\dots, v_r)=0$. Since we can do this for all points and input vectors, it follows $\omega = 0$ as an $r$-form on $U$.
So now we can assume $r=n$. But this case is easy, since using local coordinates we have $\omega = f\text{d}x^1 \wedge\cdots\wedge \text{d}x^n$. But $f$ must vanish since if we were to take balls of radius $\epsilon$ around $p\in U$ by the integral mean value theorem $$ f(p) = \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{\text{vol}(B(\epsilon,p))}\int_{B(\epsilon,p)}f = \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{\text{vol}(B(\epsilon,p))}\int_{B(\epsilon,p)}\omega = \lim_{\epsilon\rightarrow 0}0=0 $$
Edit: I think concluding $\omega = 0$ on $V$ wasn't true. I was confused because this is true when thinking of $\omega|_V \in \Omega^r(V)$ as a form on a manifold and not the ambient open neighborhood. But infact, by definition $(\varphi^{-1})^*\omega$ being zero translates only to how $\omega$ acts on tangent vectors to $V$ at $p$. This is not a major problem and I have updated my solution.