Equivalence of relative and (reduced) homology for arbitrary pairs

193 Views Asked by At

I could not find my mistake in the following argument, though I know it is wrong. This is more like a "Q&A", since there is nothing to "prove" in the positive sense. Here it goes:

For an arbitrary pair (X, A) with A non-empty, we know that for positive $n$

$H_n(X, A) \simeq H_n(X \cup CA - x, CA - x) \simeq H_n(X \cup CA, CA) \simeq H_n(X \cup CA) \simeq H_n(X/A)$

where $CA$ is attached to $X$ by $[(a, 0)] \simeq a \in X$, $x$ is the tip of the cone, and the iso's are by: homotopy invariance, excision, long sequence and again homotopy invariance by the following, which is my concern:

Let $f : X \cup CA \to X/A, x \mapsto x, CA \mapsto [A]$ and $g : X/A \to X \cup CA, x \mapsto x, [A] \mapsto [(a, 1)]$ for any $a \in A$. Then $fg = 1$ and $gf \simeq 1$ by $h_t : X \cup CA \to X \cup CA, x \mapsto x, [(a, 1 - s)] \mapsto [(a, 1 - ts)]$, $0 \le t \le 1$.

What did I do wrong in the above? I would also like to know what is true (Hatcher hints that this leads somewhere, but it is not clear from the phrasing.) This matters in the economy of that chapter.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

The point $[(a,1)]\in X\cup CA$ is the top of the attached cone, it has the open neighborhood $$ U = \left\{\, [(a,t)]\, \middle|\, t>\frac 1 2\,\right\}.$$ Now the preimage under $g$ is $g^{-1}(U) = \{[A]\}$, since every $x\notin A$ is mapped outside the cone. Thus, for $g$ to be continuous, you need the one-point set $\{[A]\}$ to be open in $X/A$ which is equivalent to $A$ being open in $X$.