Equivalence of valuated vectors in standard matroids

71 Views Asked by At

Valuated matroids can be defined in terms of valuated vectors. I'm wondering whether is there an equivalent definition for ordinary matroids?

Below I include two standard definitions of valuated matroids.

Let $V$ be a finite set. If $X$ is an element of $(\mathcal{R}\cup\{\infty\})^V$, let $X_i$ denote the $i$-th element of the $\vert V \vert$-tuple and $\underline{X}$ denote the support of $X$, that is, the set of entries in the $\vert V \vert$-tuple which are not $\infty$.

A valuated matroid on $V$ is a family $\mathcal{X}\subseteq (\mathcal{R}\cup\{\infty\})^V$ such that

  1. $(\infty,\ldots,\infty)\notin\mathcal{X}$,
  2. if $X,Y\in\mathcal{X}$ with $\underline{X}\neq \underline{Y}$ then $\underline{X} \nsubseteq \underline{Y}$,
  3. for $X\in \mathcal{X}$ and $\alpha\in \mathcal{R}$, $X+\alpha\textbf{1}\in\mathcal{X}$ holds,
  4. for $X,Y\in\mathcal{X}$ and $u,v\in V$ with $X_u=Y_u\neq \it$ and $X_v<Y_v$, there exists $Z\in\mathcal{X}$ such that $Z_u=\infty$, $Z_v=X_v$ and $Z\geq\min (X,Y)$.

We call the set $\mathcal{X}$ the valuated circuits. Now let us consider $\underline{\mathcal{X}}: = \{\underline{X} \mid X\in \mathcal{X} \}$. Then $\underline{\mathcal{X}}$ is a circuit family for an ordinary matroid on $V$.

Valuated matroids can be described equivalently in terms of valuated vectors in the following way.

Let $V$ be a finite set. A valuated matroid on $V$ is a family of $|V|$-tuples $\mathcal{V}\subseteq (\mathcal{R}\cup\{\infty\})^V$ such that

  1. $(\infty,\ldots,\infty)\in \mathcal{V}$,
  2. if $X,Y \in \mathcal{V}$, then $\min(X,Y)\in\mathcal{V}$, where the minimum is taken coordinate-wise,
  3. for $X\in \mathcal{V}$ and $\alpha \in \mathcal{R}$, we have $X+\alpha\textbf{1}\in\mathcal{V}$, where $\textbf{1} = (1,\ldots,1)$,
  4. for $X,Y\in\mathcal{V}$ and $u\in V$ with $X_u=Y_u\neq\infty$, there is $Z\in \mathcal{V}$ such that $Z_u=\infty$, $Z\geq\min(X,Y)$ and $Z_i=\min(X_i,Y_i)$ for all $i$ with $X_i\neq Y_i$.

So my question is whether is there an equivalent definition of an ordinary matroid in terms of the set $\underline{\mathcal{V}}: = \{\underline{V} \mid X\in \mathcal{V} \}$?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

For matroids, these are sometimes known as the set of vectors of a matroid. Other ways of characterizing the vectors of a matroid are:

  • $X$ is a vector of $M$ if and only if $X$ intersects no cocircuit of $M$ in exactly one element.
  • $X$ is a vector of $M$ if and only if the complement of $X$ is a flat of $M^*$.
  • $X$ is a vector of $M$ if and only if $X$ is a union of circuits of $M$.

The last property generalizes to valuated matroids as well: the vectors of a valuated matroid are exactly the tropical linear combinations of the circuits of a valuated matroid.

A bit of shameless self-promotion: a paper of mine with Colin Crowley and Noah Giansiracusa investigated matroidal interpretations of various constructions coming from valuated matroids. It can be found here: https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.03440