It can be shown that, if $f:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}$ is a smooth function and the Cartesian and polar coordinates are related by $$ x = \rho\cos\phi\\ y = \rho\sin\phi $$ that $\partial f/\partial x$ may be written (using the chain rule) like $$ \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x} = \cos\phi\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \rho} - \dfrac{\sin\phi}{\rho}\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \phi} \tag{1} $$ Because $\partial f/\partial \rho:\mathbb{R}^2\to\mathbb{R}$ is also smooth, we can replace $f$ by $\partial f/\partial \rho$ in equation $(1)$, implying that smooth functions also obey $$ \dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \rho}\right) = \cos\phi\dfrac{\partial^2f}{\partial\rho^2} - \dfrac{\sin\phi}{\rho} \dfrac{\partial^2 f}{\partial\phi\partial\rho} \tag{2} $$ However, when I try to calculate $(2)$ by mixing up the order of differentiation, I get an extra term: $$ \begin{align*} \dfrac{\partial}{\partial\rho}\left(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}\right) &= \dfrac{\partial}{\partial\rho}\left( \cos\phi\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \rho} - \dfrac{\sin\phi}{\rho} \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \phi} \right) \\ &= \cos\phi\dfrac{\partial^2f}{\partial\rho^2} - \dfrac{\sin\phi}{\rho}\dfrac{\partial^2f}{\partial\rho\partial\phi} + \dfrac{\sin\phi}{\rho^2}\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial \phi} \tag{3} \end{align*} $$ So could anybody please explain to me why expression $(2)$ and $(3)$ are not the same?
2026-03-25 20:13:49.1774469629
Error with mixed derivatives during derivation of Laplacian in polar coordinates
193 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Related Questions in POLAR-COORDINATES
- Second directional derivative of a scaler in polar coordinate
- polar coordinate subtitution
- $dr$ in polar co-ordinates
- Finding the centroid of a triangle in hyperspherical polar coordinates
- Arc length of polar function and x interceps
- Evaluation of $I=\iint_R e^{-(x^2+y^2)} \,dx\,dy$ by change of variable
- Finding area bound by polar graph
- Question about the roots of a complex polynomial
- Polar Area Integral with Absolute Function
- How to compute 'polar form' of a line given two points in cartesian coordinate system?
Related Questions in LAPLACIAN
- Polar Brownian motion not recovering polar Laplacian?
- Trivial demonstration. $\nabla J(r,t)=\frac{\hbar}{im}\nabla\psi^{*}\nabla\psi+\frac{\hbar}{im}\psi\nabla^2\psi$
- Bochner nonnegativity theorem for Laplace-Beltrami eigenfunctions?
- Physicists construct their potentials starting from the Laplace equation, why they do not use another differential operator, like theta Θ?
- Integral of the Laplacian of a function that is constant on the sphere
- Trying to show 9 point laplacian equivalence
- Does the laplacian operator work on time as well as spacial variables?
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Laplace-Beltrami operator in $\mathbb{R}^m$
- demonstration of vector laplacian in cartesian coordinates
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You can't change the order of differentiation with respect to a pair of variables belonging to different coordinate systems! While it's true that $f''_{xy}=f''_{yx}$ and $f''_{\rho\phi}=f''_{\phi\rho}$ (if $f$ is nice enough), there is no reason to believe that $f''_{\rho x} = f''_{x \rho}$, and in fact it's not true in general, as simple examples show.
Remember that taking a partial derivative with respect to $x$ involves keeping $y$ constant, and taking a partial derivative with respect to $\rho$ involves keeping $\phi$ constant, so even if the "partner variables" $y$ and $\phi$ are not "visible" in the expressions $f''_{\rho x}$ and $f''_{x \rho}$, they are very much a part of the game.