Evaluate
$$\sum_{k=1}^{100} S_k, \; S_k = \text{coefficient of} \; x^{100} \; \text{in the series representation of} \; \left(\sum_{t=1}^\infty \left(\frac{x}{1-x} - x^k\right)^t = \frac{-x + x^k - x^{k+1}}{-1 + 2x - x^k + x^{k+1}}\right)$$
I derived the above summation when working on the following problem:
Randomly choose a number from the set $\{1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 100\}$. Now get rid of all compositions of $100$ containing that number. What is the expected value of the sum of all remaining compositions?
The coefficients of the summation are obviously extraordinarily large, so brute force computation (although possible) is not what I seek. I suspect there is a nice closed form for the summation (for example, $3^{100}$). Furthermore, I'm not sure if $100$ is just an arbitrary number or has special properties, so if this can be extended generally for all $n$, I'd love to see!
The coefficients seem to follow some kind of pattern but not enough for me to come up with a general representation. For example, for $k=1$, the coefficients form the Fibonacci sequence, and for $k>1$, there seems to be some kind of summation of previous terms to get the next. But I'm unable to put my finger on exactly what is happening.
Note: I am specifically looking for a way to evaluate the summation and not alternative ways to solve the original problem i.e the problem on the expected value of compositions.
This is not an answer but it is too long for comments.
Let $$\Sigma_m=\sum_{k=1}^{m} S_k$$
Suprisingly, it is not so large $$\Sigma_{100}=59593883622412940379239150329953$$ considering that $S_1$ is already equal to $218922995834555169026$
What seems to be interesting is that $\Big[\Sigma_{m+1}-2\,\Sigma_{m}+\Sigma_{m-1}\Big]$ is maximum for $m=5$
Another remark $$m\log(\Sigma_{m})\sim k\, (m-1)\qquad \qquad (R^2=0.9999957)$$ and, within a relative error of $2.59\times 10^{-21}$ $$k \sim \frac{121}{10}+\frac{186}{5 \log (2)}+\frac{371 \log (2)}{30}+\frac{161}{5 \log (3)}-\frac{269 \log (3)}{10}$$