Every finite integral domain is a field (why is it commutative?)

185 Views Asked by At

Okay, a finite integral domain is a finite ring $D$ such that for every $a, b \in D, ab = 0$ iff $a = 0$ or $b = 0$. We want that $D$ is a field, meaning it has a unit element ($1$), every element is invertible and it is abelian.

First, I prove that every element is invertible:

  1. Assume $|D| = n$
  2. Take $a \in D, a \neq 0$, then multiply it by itself $n + 1$ times. By the pidgeonhole principle, there exists at least one element in $$\{a, a^2, a^3, ..., a^{n+1}\}$$ such that $a^i = a^j$ with $i > j$
  3. Now, take $a^i - a^j = 0$ (we can do it because $D$ is a ring) and get $a^j(a^{i-j}-1)=0$
  4. Since $D$ is an integral domain, either $a^j=0$ or $(a^{i-j}-1)=0$, but $a^j \neq 0$ because $D$ is an integral domain, therefore $(a^{i-j}-1)=0$, so $a^{i-j}=1$.
  5. $a^{i-j}=1$ means $a·a^{i-j-1}=1$ (Notice $i-j-1\geq0$ because $i-j>0$) so $a$ is invertible.

Notice from step 4 we also know $1 \in D$ as $D$ is a ring and, therefore, the product operation of two elements of $D$ stays in $D$.

Now, I am stuck at how do you prove it is abelian by the product? Everywhere I look people just assume it is abelian, but on my book it says it needn't be (for example, the quaternions).

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On

An integral domain is commutative by definition, or at least the standard definition. (The term "abelian" is specific to groups, not ring multiplication.) You're thinking of what's generally called a finite division ring. Then the result you speak of is Wedderburn's Little Theorem (this Wikipedia article includes the usual proof).