I kind of know what SAT problem is and I need the exact formal description of this problem for S4 logic. I am trying to prove this problem is PSPACE-Complete! Any help would be very much appreciated!
2026-03-25 05:41:27.1774417287
Exact definition of SAT problem in S4
68 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPUTATIONAL-COMPLEXITY
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Proving big theta notation?
- Little oh notation
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- sources about SVD complexity
- Is all Linear Programming (LP) problems solvable in Polynomial time?
- growth rate of $f(x)= x^{1/7}$
- Unclear Passage in Cook's Proof of SAT NP-Completeness: Why The Machine M Should Be Modified?
- Minimum Matching on the Minimum Triangulation
- How to find the average case complexity of Stable marriage problem(Gale Shapley)?
Related Questions in MODAL-LOGIC
- Counter examples in modal logic
- Quantified Modal Logic - How does an existence predicate help with a fixed-domain model?
- Modal logic with MLp as an axiom
- From modal to classical logic
- Maximal Consistent Sets of wff
- $\sf K$-proof of $(\Box p \land \Diamond q) \rightarrow \Diamond (p\land q)$
- Problem set of modal logic with solution
- Determine a modal logic formula which a connective that is not valid but is true
- What is the Upper-Bound for a Kripke Model in Normal Modal Logics?
- Understanding The First Axiom Of Gödel's Ontological Proof
Related Questions in KRIPKE-MODELS
- Counter examples in modal logic
- Determine a modal logic formula which a connective that is not valid but is true
- What is the Upper-Bound for a Kripke Model in Normal Modal Logics?
- Proving $\lnot \lnot (\psi \lor \lnot \psi)$ is a theorem of intuitionistic propositional logic
- Proving the Glivenko theorem via Kripke models
- Understanding The First Axiom Of Gödel's Ontological Proof
- $\mathcal{M} \models \Box \phi \rightarrow \Box \Box \phi$ for all $\phi$ if and only if $\mathcal{M}$ is transitive
- How to prove in K $ \vdash_{p \rightarrow \lozenge \square p} (\square p \rightarrow \lozenge p)$?
- Counterexample of Goldblatt-Thomason theorem
- characterization of non-reflexive Kripke frames
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Welcome to MSE!
In general, if we are given a logic $\mathcal{L}$ (which includes a notion of semantics), we can ask the $\mathcal{L}\mathsf{SAT}$ problem1:
A solution for $\mathcal{L}\mathsf{SAT}$ takes in a formula $\phi$ as input and either outputs a model $\mathfrak{M} \models \phi$ or outputs a ($\mathcal{L}$-)proof that $\phi$ is not satisfiable.
So in your case, a solution to the $\mathsf{S4~SAT}$ problem takes in a sentence in $\mathsf{S4}$ and either outputs
The classic reference for proving $\mathsf{PSPACE}$ hardness of this problem is Ladner's paper "The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic".
1: There is definitely a law school joke to be made here...
I hope this helps ^_^