I dont have totally clear the meaning of the expression
$$\sup_{n\in\Bbb N}\left\|\sum_{k=0}^ng_k\right\|_\infty<\infty$$
for a series of functions $g_k$ valued in $\Bbb R$ or $\Bbb C$. In particular I dont know if the supremum over the naturals have the infinity included as a "limit point" or so. The difference is very important:
if infinity is a "limit point" of $\Bbb N$ then the above expression doesnt necessarily imply that the series eventually decreases or remain constant.
if infinity is not a limit point of $\Bbb N$ then the above expression imply that the series eventually decreases or stay constant.
Unfortunately the context where I get this (an exercise) dont show clearly what is the exact meaning. I would like to assume the second, what would simplify the exercise dramatically, but Im not sure. Some help will be appreciated.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by including infinity as a limit point of $\mathbb{N}$ but I will offer you my interpretation of what the expression is telling you.
It seems to me that $\{g_k\}$ is a sequence of functions, and essentially here we've defined another sequence of functions, say $f_n$, by $$f_n(x)=\sum_{k=1}^{n}g_k(x).$$ So the expression merely says that $\sup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}||f_n||_\infty <\infty$. That is, $f_n$ is uniformly bounded by some finite $M<\infty$. Then, in particular, for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$ or whatever the underlying domain is, and for all $n$ we must have $$|f_n(x)|=|g_1(x)+...+g_n(x)|\leq M.$$ As for the individual $g_k$, it follows that $|g_k(x)|=|f_{k}(x)-f_{k-1}(x)|\leq |f_{k}(x)|+|f_{k-1}(x)|\leq 2M<\infty$. With all that said, I don't think you can say much about the increasing/decreasing nature of $f_n$.