Example 4.21 in Baby Rudin: Why is the inverse of this function not continuous at this point?

602 Views Asked by At

Here's Theorem 4.17 in the book Principles of Mathematical Analysis by Walter Rudin, 3rd edition:

Suppose $f$ is a continuous 1-1 mapping of a compact metric space $X$ onto a metric space $Y$. Then the inverse mapping $f^{-1}$ defined on $Y$ by $$ f^{-1}( f(x) ) = x \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ( x \in X ) $$ is a continuous mapping of $Y$ onto $X$.

Now in Example 4.21 Rudin illustrates that compactness of $X$ is essential in Theorem 4.17.

So here is Example 4.21:

Let $X$ be the half open interval $[0, 2 \pi )$ on the real line, and let $\mathbf{f}$ be the mapping of $X$ onto the circle $Y$ consisting of all points whose distance from the origin is $1$, given by $$ \mathbf{f}(t) = ( \cos t, \sin t ) \ \ \ \ \ \ ( 0 \leq t < 2 \pi). $$ Then this function $\mathbf{f}$ is of course continuous and injective. But Rudin asserts that the inverse function is discontinuous at the point $(1, 0) = \mathbf{f}(0)$. How to demonstrate this fact rigorously?

So far in the book, Rudin has not discussed the functions $\cos$ and $\sin$. So can we come up with an example that uses only what Rudin has discussed?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

The inverse function goes from the unit circle to the interval $[0, 2\pi)$. Consider looping around the circle toward the point $(1,0)$, once clockwise and once counter-clockwise.

When you approach clockwise, your angle (the output of the inverse function) decreases to $0$. But, when you approach counter-clockwise, your angle is INCREASING to $2\pi$. So, there is not a consistent limit at that point, and it is therefore discontinuous.