When I encountered Banach spaces I was presented with some proofs that link completeness, vector spaces, series and sequences (of partial sums). In particular I was presented with the following theorem:
A normed vector space X is complete if and only if every absolutely summable series in X is summable. That is, X is complete if and only if $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}x_n$ converges in X whenever $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}||x_n|| < \infty$.
The problem I am facing is that I can only imagine that every absolutely summable series in X is always summable, as that is what I was taught. (This is what I thought initially; I know now it is not true.)
I then did some searching online, as well as here, and came to the conclusion that this theorem is actually the defining factor in that statement; Completeness links absolutely summable series to summable series, and conversely, when absolutely summable series are summable they define a complete space. This must mean that all 'examples' I can think of (or in other words, the scope of my imagination) are examples in Banach spaces.
This however raises the following question:
Can anyone provide me with some examples of absolutely summable series in a normed vector space that are not summable, and explain why?
To clarify further, my goal is to understand what is the defining difference between being absolutely summable and summable. I suppose that the norm (or metric) used is key, as this defines when $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}||x_n|| < \infty$. I just don't see it yet. If there is any way to link the explanation to Cauchy sequences, as most proofs use that approach, that would be great. Thanks!
Take $\mathbb Q$, which is a vector space over $\mathbb Q$, and let $0.a_1a_2\ldots$ be the decimal expansion of $\sqrt2-1$. Then $\sum_{n\geq1}a_n10^{-n}$ does not converge in $\mathbb Q$, but we have that $\sum_{n\geq1}\|a_n10^{-n}\|=\sum_{n\geq1}a_n10^{-n}$ converges (to $\sqrt2-1$, of course).
For a less trivial example, take $C_c(\mathbb R)\subset L^2(\mathbb R)$, approach $\exp(-x^2)\in L^2$ by a sequence $(u_n)$ of continuous functions with compact supports, rewrite this as a series $\sum_{n\geq1}f_n$ with $f_n=u_n-u_{n-1}$ (agreeing on $u_0=0$). Then the series is absolutely summable, but not summable, because the limit $\exp(-x^2)$ is not in $C_c(\mathbb R)$.
The point is that an absolutely convergent series need not converge since in a non-complete space a Cauchy sequence need not converge. Each non-complete space can be used to construct such an example. Note that an absolutely summable series defines a Cauchy sequence (of its partial sums). Hence it should converge in the completion $\overline X$ of your original space $X$. The only way that the sequence does not converge in $X$, is when $X\neq \overline X$, so when $X$ is not complete.