I am trying to show that the space of left invariant $n$-forms for an $n-$dimensional Lie group $G$ has dimension $1$. Now I was able to see that if we have a left-invariant $1-$form then it's value depends only at the values of $\omega_e$ has so the maximum dimension of this space will be $1$. Now I am trying to prove the existence of such forms. For this take an element $\omega_e \in \Lambda^n(T_eG)$ and define $\omega_g(X_1,...,X_n)=\omega_e((dL_{g^{-1}})_g X_1,...,(dL_{g^{-1}})_gX_n)$, and it's easy to see that is left-invariant. Now my problem is checking that in fact we have smoothness. For this I tried seeing that $\omega$ defines a multilinear alernating map from $\mathfrak{X}(M)\times ... \times \mathfrak{X}(M)\rightarrow C^{\infty}(M)$. Now the problem is that if I have vector fields $X_1,...,X_n$ I can't seem to argument why the function $\omega(X_1,...,X_n)(g)=\omega_e((dL_{g^{-1}})_g X_1(g),...,(dL_{g^{-1}})_g X_n(g) )$ is smooth , since we have that the $L_g^{-1}$ are changing . Any help with this last part is aprecciated . Thanks in advance.
2026-04-13 04:12:13.1776053533
Existence of left invariant $n-$forms in a lie Group
858 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-FORMS
- Using the calculus of one forms prove this identity
- Relation between Fubini-Study metric and curvature
- Integration of one-form
- Time derivative of a pullback of a time-dependent 2-form
- Elliptic Curve and Differential Form Determine Weierstrass Equation
- I want the pullback of a non-closed 1-form to be closed. Is that possible?
- How to find 1-form for Stokes' Theorem?
- Verify the statement about external derivative.
- Understanding time-dependent forms
- form value on a vector field
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You already proved that a left invariant $n$-form would be unique up to a constant. Now, to prove that there indeed exist such a left invariant $n$-form, let $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ be a basis of $T_eG$. Let $\theta^1,\ldots,\theta^n$ be its dual basis in $T_eG^*$. Then $\omega_e=\theta^1\wedge\cdots\wedge \theta^n$ is a non-zero differential form of degree $n$ in $T_eG$ because $\omega_e(X_1\wedge\cdots\wedge X_n) = 1$. Now, one can define a $n$-form $\omega$ on $G$ by requiring it to be left invariant, that is $$ \omega_g = \omega_e\left((\mathrm{d}L_{g^{-1}})\cdot,\ldots,\left(\mathrm{d}L_{g^{-1}}\right)\cdot \right) $$ It is a smooth $n$-form, and it is left invariant by construction. The smoothness follows from the fact that $g \mapsto \mathrm{d}L_{g^{-1}}$ is smooth because $G$ is a Lie group! Then, if $X$ is a vector field, in the left invariant frame $X_1,\ldots,X_n$ created from the basis on $T_eG$, one can write $$ Y(g) =\sum_{i=1}^n Y^i(g)\left(\mathrm{d}L_gX_i\right) $$ and then $$ \omega_g(Y_1(g),\ldots,Y_n(g)) = \omega_g\left(\sum_{i}Y_1^j(g)X_i(g),\cdots,\sum_{i}Y_n^j(g)X_i(g) \right) $$ And using linearity and left-invariance of $\omega_g$ and $X_j(g)$, the smoothness follows from the smoothness of the function $g\mapsto Y_j^i(g)$. Hence, $\omega$ is smooth.