I am trying to prove that $E[D(X_n, X_0)]$ is roughly equals $ \sqrt{n}~$ using Multivariate Central limit theorem. $$$$ So I represent a d-dimensional simple symmetric random walk $~S~$ such that $~S_n = X_1 + ... + X_n$ where $X_k~'s$ are i.i.d random vectors for all $k~ {\geq}~ 0$ which are uniformly distributed on $~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$ {$\pm{e_j,~ j= 1,...,d}$} where $~e_1,...,e_d$ are the canonical basis of $Z^d$. Obviously the expected value is zero component-wise, I know $$\frac{S_n}{\sqrt{n}} \rightarrow N(\overrightarrow{0}, \Sigma)$$ here comes my struggle to apply multivariate CLT, and then to arrive to $E(D) \sim \sqrt{n} \\$ . $~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$Can you help me with that?, Thank you in advance
2026-04-02 20:54:24.1775163264
Expected distance from origin of random walk on Z^d using multivariate CLT
79 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RANDOM-WALK
- Random walk on $\mathbb{Z}^2$
- Density distribution of random walkers in a unit sphere with an absorbing boundary
- Monkey Random walk using binomial distribution
- Find probability function of random walk, stochastic processes
- Random walk with probability $p \neq 1$ of stepping at each $\Delta t$
- Average distance between consecutive points in a one-dimensional auto-correlated sequence
- Return probability random walk
- Random Walk: Quantiles, average and maximal walk
- motion on the surface of a 3-sphere
- Probability of symmetric random walk being in certain interval on nth step
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-ANALYSIS
- Cross Variation of stochatic integrals
- Solution of an HJB equation in continuous time
- Initial Distribution of Stochastic Differential Equations
- Infinitesimal generator of $3$-dimensional Stochastic differential equation
- On the continuity of Gaussian processes on the interval [0,1] depending on the continuity of the covariance function
- Joint Markov property of a Markov chain and its integral against Brownian Motion
- How can a martingale be a density process?
- Show that for a continuous Gaussian martingale process $M$ that $\langle M, M \rangle_t = f(t)$ is continuous, monotone, and nondecreasing
- Laplace transform of hitting time of Brownian motion with drift
- Is the solution to this (simple) Stochastic Differential Equation unique?
Related Questions in CENTRAL-LIMIT-THEOREM
- Another application of the Central Limit Theorem
- Prove that central limit theorem Is applicable to a new sequence
- On the rate of convergence of the central limit theorem
- Central limit theorem - Coin toss
- Example of central limit theorem fail due to dependence (for tuition)
- Example of easy calculations with the central limit theorem in higher dimensions
- Probability to have exactly 55 heads on 100 coin flips and CLT
- Chebyshev's inequality and CLT to approximate 1.000.000 coin tosses probability
- Lindeberg condition fails, but a CLT still applies
- Central limit theorem with different variance
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If I understand your question correctly, the missing ingredient is the continuous mapping theorem. The assertion $$ \frac{S_n}{\sqrt n}\stackrel d\to Z,\tag1 $$ where $Z$ has multivariate normal $N(\vec0,\Sigma)$ distribution, is already the multivariate CLT, so apply the continuous mapping theorem to (1) using the function $g(t):=\|t\|:=(t_1^2+t_2^2+\cdots + t_d^2)^{1/2}$ (i.e., $g$ is the $d$-dimensional Euclidean norm) to conclude $$ \left\|\frac{S_n}{\sqrt n}\right\|\stackrel d\to \| Z\|.\tag2$$
The LHS of (2) equals $D/\sqrt n$. This may be enough for you to assert (heuristically) that $E(D)$ is roughly $\sqrt n$. In fact, you can argue further that $$E\left(\left\|\frac{S_n}{\sqrt n}\right\|\right)\to E(\| Z\|),\tag3 $$ an assertion that does not follow immediately from (2). A rigorous proof of (3) would note that the LHS of (2) has constant variance independent of $n$, and therefore is uniformly bounded in $L^2$, which implies uniform integrability and justifies (3).