Five properties are sold at varying prices and number of square feet.
SQ FT PRICE Price/Sq Ft
1635 $630000 $385.32
2045 $675000 $330.07
1900 $685000 $360.53
2045 $700000 $342.30
2305 $715000 $310.20
==== ======== =======
9930 $3045000 $345.68
The report shows the Average Price per Square Foot as \$345.68. Which I think is incorrect. I think it should be \$3045000/9930 = \$342.90 per sq ft. How do I explain to the administrators responsible for these reports that they cannot use an average of the averages to give the Average Price per Square Foot of these homes. They must total the square footage and total the prices and then divide the total price by the total square footage to determine the actual average price per square foot, right?!?
If I understand your question correctly, you are right: averaging the averages is almost always a terrible thing to do.
It will probably help to show a simple extreme example. Suppose I first "sell" $9,999$ square feet for $\$0$ total, and then sell one remaining square foot for $\$10$. In total, I've sold $10,000$ square feet and spent $\$10$, but the average of the averages would suggest that I've been spending an average of $\$5$ per square foot (since ${0+10\over 2}=5$).
It should be obvious that this is silly - especially since we could replace $9,999$ with literally any other number and get the same "answer" when taking the average of averages!