As in The volume preserving mean curvature flow, consider the volume preserving mean curvature $$ \partial_tF(x,t)=(h(t)-H(x,t))\cdot\nu(x,t) ~~~x\in U, t\ge 0 \\ F(\cdot, 0 )=F_0 \\ h(t)=\frac{\int_{M_t}Hd\mu}{\int_{M_t}d\mu} $$ $F_0:R^n\supset U\rightarrow F_0(U)\subset M_0\subset R^{n+1}$ is local represent of $M_0$ . $H=g^{ij}h_{ij}$ , $h_{ij}$ is the second fundamental form. Then, there is $$ \sup_{M_t}|H-h|\rightarrow 0 \text{ as } t\rightarrow \infty $$ Then, what is the mean of red line in picture below, I mean that what decays exponentially ? And why ?
2026-03-25 00:09:21.1774397361
Exponentially decay of volume preserving mean curvature flow
104 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in MEAN-CURVATURE-FLOWS
- A inequality in stability of mean curvature flow
- An application of Topping's diameter estimates
- Blow up of mean curvature in mean curvature flow
- Curvature of Circles in different Radius
- What is little Holder space?
- Good references to start studying the curve shortening flow
- Equivalence class of the normal flow
- How to understand the flow of time-depended vector field
- Whether we have $|\nabla^m \mathring A| \le C(m,n) |\nabla^m A|$?
- Dirichlet Problem for Quasi-linear Parabolic Equation that Degenerates at Endpoints
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?

They are talking about the rate of change of the surface under the flow, which is given by $$ \left| \frac{\partial}{\partial t} F \right| = |H-h| $$ recalling that $F(x,t)$ describes the mapping of the manifold from coordinates in $\mathbb{R}^n$ to points on the surface in $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$.
The equation for the flow (which describes how $F$ changes over time) defines a rate of change of the surfaces (i.e. how different is $M_{t}$ from $M_{t-\epsilon}$). Thus, the LHS of the equation just above is the "velocity of the surfaces", as the authors put it. (I guess I would call it the speed).
Hence, the quantity that is decaying exponentially is that rate. So, intuitively, as the flow goes on, the effect that it has on the surface becomes "weaker". If you could look at the surface visually (as you can in $\mathbb{R}^3$), as the flow begins, it will quickly "smooth out" all the local details, but then have less and less of a noticeable effect over time. For very high times, it will have essentially converged (to a sphere in the convex case in the paper) and you not be able to notice any change in $F$ at all.
Now, why does it decay exponentially? (or how do they show it?)
The authors define $A=[h]_{ij}$ to be the second fundamental form. Then, $|A|^2=g^{ij}g^{kl}h_{ik}h_{jl}$. They then show: $$ |A|^2 - \frac{1}{n}H^2 \leq c \exp(-\delta t) $$ for constants $c,\delta\in\mathbb{R}$. In words, the difference between the "norm" of the second fundamental form and the mean curvature vanishes exponentially quickly in time. It's not obvious (to me anyway) why that implies the surface stops changing exponentially quickly as well, but earlier the authors show that: $$ |A|^2 - \frac{1}{n}H^2 = \frac{1}{n} \sum\limits_{i<j} (\kappa_i - \kappa_j)^2 $$ where $\kappa_i$ satisfy $h_{ij}=\kappa_i \delta_{ij}$ in some coordinate system (i.e. they are the principal curvatures).
This makes it a little easier to see what they mean: basically all the differences between the principal curvatures shrink to a constant exponentially fast.
(If anyone sees something else in the paper I missed, let me know)