Why are $L^p$ functions defined almost everywhere? As if we are defining an $L^p$ function on a set $\Omega=[0,1]$ , so we say $f \in L^p(]0,1[)$ almost everywhere. And not on $[0,1]$ !
2026-03-29 10:07:55.1774778875
$f \in L^p(]0,1[)$ almost everywhere.
163 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LP-SPACES
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- Understanding the essential range
- Problem 1.70 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Showing a sequence is in $\ell^1$
- How to conclude that $\ell_\infty$ is not separable from this exercise?
- Calculating the gradient in $L^p$ space when $0<p<1$ and the uderlying set is discrete and finite
- $f_{n} \in L^{p}(X),$ such that $\lVert f_{n}-f_{n+1}\rVert_{p} \leq \frac{1}{n^2}$. Prove $f_{n}$ converges a.e.
- Find a sequence converging in distribution but not weakly
- Elementary use of Hölder inequality
- Identify $\operatorname{co}(\{e_n:n\in\mathbb N\})$ and $\overline{\operatorname{co}}(\{e_n : n\in\mathbb N\})$ in $c_0$ and $\ell^p$
Related Questions in ALMOST-EVERYWHERE
- Normed bounded sequence of $L^2[0,1]$
- A function which is not equal almost everywhere (wrt Lebesgue measure) to a continuous function and not almost everywhere continuous function
- $f:\mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ measurable and $f(x)=f(x+1)$ almost everywhere
- Proof that if $f_n\to f$ a.e., $g_n \to g$ a.e. and $g_n = f_n$ a.e. implies $f=g$ a.e.
- Does the sum $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2^k \cdot |x-r_k|^\frac{1}{2}}$ coverges a.e?
- Uniform convergence of finite sum of functions
- Almost surely convergence of a monotone stochastic process
- Does almost everywhere equality means equality on the quotient space?
- Extending continuous functions from almost everywhere to everywhere
- Sufficient conditions for $L^2$ convergence implying almost everywhere convergence.
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
That's because of the way we construct the $L^p$ spaces. First you look at the vector space (let $\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{R}$) $$ \mathcal{L}^p = \left\{ f\colon \Omega \to \mathbb{R} : f \text{ measurable and} \int_\Omega |f(x)|^p dx < \infty\right\} $$ and the mapping $$ q\colon \mathcal{L^p} \to [0,\infty[,\ f\mapsto \Bigg(\int_\Omega |f(x)|^p dx\Bigg)^{\frac{1}{p}} $$ and notice that it defines a seminorm (use Minkowski's inequality). Next you look want to "convert" this into a norm. When you have a seminorm you can look at the set $$ N = \left\{f \in \mathcal{L}^p | q(f)=0\right\} = \left\{f \in \mathcal{L}^p : \int_\Omega |f(x)| dx = 0\right\}. $$ Now you define $L^p := \mathcal{L}^p / N$ as the quotient vector space.
What this essentially does is the following: We have $$ f=g \text{ a.e.} \Leftrightarrow \int_\Omega |(f-g)(x)| dx= 0\\ \Leftrightarrow q(f-g)= \Bigg(\int_\Omega |(f-g)(x)|^p dx\Bigg)^{\frac{1}{p}} = 0. $$
so every time $f=g$ almost everywhere, they land in the same equivalence class. This means, while they may be different functions (they can differ on a null set), they are "the same thing" in $L^p$. When we integrate, we can't tell the difference.
For example you could look at $L^p([0,1])$ and the functions $$ f\colon [0,1]\to \mathbb{R},\ f(x) = \begin{cases}0,\ \text{if } x\in \mathbb{Q},\\ 1,\ \text{otherwise.}\end{cases}\\ g\colon [0,1]\to \mathbb{R},\ g(x) = 1. $$ Now $g$ and $f$ only differ on a set of measure null (they are equal almost everywhere). But this means they lie in the same equivalence class. Therefore they are the same element in $L^p$. So although we might have different functions $f$ and $g$, if we can't tell them apart by our integral ($q(f)=q(g)$), we say they are the same element in $L^p$. That's why it's okay to define them almost everywhere. We can always set them to $0$ or basically anything we want on the null set and get a function that represents the same thing and is fully defined.
In your case $\{0,1\}$ is null set, therefore it doesn't matter if we talk about $[0,1]$ or $[0,1]\setminus \{0,1\} = ]0,1[$ and define the function only on the smaller set.
[I'm working with the Lebesgue measure in this post]
edit regarding your comment: Well, we know that for $x\in [0,\infty[$ and $r\in ]0,\infty[$ $$ x^r = 0 \Leftrightarrow x=0, $$ therefore $$ q(f) = 0 \Leftrightarrow \int_\Omega |f|^p dx = 0. $$ By the same argument we know $|f(x)|=0 \Leftrightarrow |f(x)|^p = 0\ (\forall x\in\Omega)$ and thus $$ \int_\Omega |f|^p dx = 0 \Leftrightarrow \int_\Omega |f| dx = 0. $$