I'm not sure if this is the right question for this platform, but I wanted to give it a try.
I'm facing following issue related to some discontinuous control theory. The basic idea of this example is taken from [1], so it is not my work.
Let's assume there is a second order differential equation given by following equation:
$$
\ddot{\theta} = u,
$$
where the value $\theta$ is simply integrating the value of $u$ twice.
So further I have "guessed" a function for $u$
$$
u =
\begin{cases}
1 & \text{if }s(\theta, \dot{\theta}) < 0 \\ -1 &\text{else},
\end{cases}
$$
with the linear function $s$ is given by:
$$
s(\theta, \dot{\theta}) = \dot{\theta} + m \; \theta.
$$
Next I wanted to see how does this system from the first equation behaves if the function of $u$ is applied. Basically I was checking for the asymptotically stability of this system. Therefore I assumed there is a Lyapunov function candidate and after derivation and some of the known expressions from above equations insert into it I got following equations:
$$
\begin{align*}
V&= \frac{s^2}{2}\\
\\
\dot{V} &= s \dot{s}\\
&= s \left( m\dot{\theta} + \ddot{\theta} \right)\\
&= s \left( m\dot{\theta} +u \right)\\
&= s \left( m\dot{\theta} -\operatorname{sgn}(s) \right).
\end{align*}
$$
So up to now it was just some background information, so that you can have an idea what is going on and what the named function and equations are about. Next I have taken, from the above cited book, the relation:
$$
s \left( m\dot{\theta} - \operatorname{sgn}(s) \right) < |s|\left(m|\dot{\theta}| -1 \right) <0.
$$
So this is my question, what is the idea behind factoring out the term $\operatorname{sgn}(s)$ and leaving the absolute value of $\dot{\theta}$ behind and say this is larger than the previous term?
[1]Edwards, Christopher, and Sarah Spurgeon. Sliding mode control: theory and applications. Crc Press, 1998.
You can see the first part by considering two cases:
Note that the inequalities are not strict and can turn to equalities if, say, your initial values are such that $s>0$ and $\theta<0$, thus implying $\dot{\theta}>0$.
The second inequality $|s|(m|\dot{\theta}|-1)<0$ is actually the most problematic one. It does not need to hold as we can have $|\dot{\theta}|>1/m$. This means that your sliding mode controller ensures convergence to the sliding mode surface only for the initial values located in a certain neighborhood of $s=0$ given by $|\dot{\theta}|<1/m$.