Let $X$ be a locally convex topological vector space. I need to show that the Minkowski functional $p_C$ for $C$ a convex open neighborhood of $0$ coming from the local base of convex sets, is faithful, that is, I must prove that for any $x \in X$, $x=0$ if an only if $p_C(x)=0$ for all $C$ as defined. The first way ($\Rightarrow$) is easy enough, but the other way ($\Leftarrow$) I am getting stuck. I have the feeling that the only way is through an indirect proof, but I can't figure out what the best strategy is.
2026-03-27 04:34:15.1774586055
Faithfullness of the Minkowski functional
145 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYSIS
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Show that $d:\mathbb{C}\times\mathbb{C}\rightarrow[0,\infty[$ is a metric on $\mathbb{C}$.
- conformal mapping and rational function
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Proving whether function-series $f_n(x) = \frac{(-1)^nx}n$
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- How to prove that $E_P(\frac{dQ}{dP}|\mathcal{G})$ is not equal to $0$
- Integral of ratio of polynomial
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in LOCALLY-CONVEX-SPACES
- The finest locally convex topology is not metrizable
- Non-Hausdorff topology on the germs of holomorphic functions
- Topological isomorphism between $C^{\infty}(\mathbb{R}) = \lim_{\leftarrow}{C^{k}([-k, k])}$
- It is always possible to define a topology in a vector space endow with a semi-norm?
- How do I prove the Local intersection property in the example(Economics)
- Why is $e \in C$ (a commutative subalgebra of $A$)?
- The space of measurable functions is Frechet?
- tensor product of locally convex spaces
- Locally convex inductive limit topology versus cofinal topology
- A problem with Theorem 6.4 in Rudin's Functional Analysis
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose $x=\mathbf{0}$. Let $C \in \gamma$ be arbitrary , where $\gamma$ is a local base of convex sets. Let $p_C$ be the Minkowski-functional associated with $C$. If $t=0$ it follows that: \begin{equation} p_C(\mathbf{0})=p_C(0\mathbf{0})=0p_C(\mathbf{0})=0 \end{equation} Which was to be proved. Conversely, suppose $p_C(x)=0$ for all $C \in \gamma$ and assume for contradiction that $x \neq \mathbf{0}$. Since $X$ is Hausdorff, there exists open neighborhoods $U_x$ and $U_\mathbf{0}$ of respectively $x$ and $\mathbf{0}$ in $X$ , such that $U_x \cap U_\mathbf{0} = \emptyset$. Since $X$ is locally convex the open neighborhood $U_\mathbf{0}$ contains an open, convex neighborhood $C' \in \gamma$. Since $C' \subseteq U_\mathbf{0}$ it follows that also $C' \cap U_x = \emptyset$. Hence $x \not\in C'$ and so the Minkowski functional $p_{C'}(x) \geq 1$. This contradicts that $p_C(x)=0$ for all $C \in \gamma$. Therefore, $x = \mathbf{0}$, as was to be proved.
This does not use the Hahn-Banach Theorem, I think.