Find a $\delta$ such that $|1/x-1| < \epsilon$ for all $x$ satisfying $0 < |x-1| < \delta$

1.3k Views Asked by At

I'm currently self studying Spivak's calculus, but the problems in the back of each chapter are quite difficult. I'm not sure where to start on this problem.

Find a $\delta$ such that $|f(x)-l| < \epsilon$ for all $x$ satisfying $0 < |x-a| < \delta$ for $f(x) = \frac1x$; $a =1$, $l =1$.

3

There are 3 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

Note that $$ \left|\frac{1}{x}-1\right|=\left|\frac{1-x}{x}\right|=\frac{|x-1|}{|x|}\tag{1} $$ Suppose that $|x-1|<\frac{1}{2}$. Then $$ 1=|1|=|(1-x)+x|\leq |1-x|+|x|=|x-1|+|x|<\frac{1}{2}+|x| $$ and hence $$ |x|>1-\frac{1}{2}=\frac{1}{2}\Longleftrightarrow \frac{1}{|x|}<2 $$ Going back to $(1)$, we have $$ \left|\frac{1}{x}-1\right|=\frac{|x-1|}{|x|}<2|x-1| $$ We want to make $\left|\frac{1}{x}-1\right|<\epsilon$ which forces $2|x-1|<\epsilon$ and so $|x-1|<\frac{\epsilon}{2}$. Hence, we choose $\delta=\min\left(\frac{1}{2},\frac{\epsilon}{2}\right)$.

Note that there is nothing special about $\frac{1}{2}$. We could use $\frac{1}{3}$ but then we would choose $\delta=\min\left(\frac{1}{3},\frac{2\epsilon}{3}\right)$.

0
On

Hint. Note that for $x> 1/2$, $$|f(x)-l|=\left|\frac{1}{x}-1\right|=\frac{|x-1|}{|x|}<\frac{|x-1|}{1/2}=2|x-1|$$ Can you take it from here?

2
On

first you can rewrite $\left|\frac{1}{x}-1\right|$ as $\frac{|x-1|}{|x|}$ and let's say $\delta=\frac{1}{2}$

now: $$|x-1|<\frac{1}{2}\implies-\frac{1}{2}<x-1<\frac{1}{2}\implies \frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{3}{2}\implies \frac{1}{2}<|x|<\frac{3}{2}\\\implies \frac{2}{3}<\frac{1}{|x|}<2$$

now we want to return to the original form:$$\frac{1}{|x|}<2\implies\frac{|x-1|}{|x|}<2|x-1|$$

now lets say that $\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{2}$(try to see why it works yourself), but now we have 2 values for $\delta$, so, we can see that $\delta=\frac{1}{2}$ works for all values of $x$ that are larger than $\frac{1}{2}$, so lets do the following:$$\delta=min\left(\frac{\epsilon}{2},\frac{1}{2}\right)$$

try to do the checking(or The Proof if you want to call it like this) alone.

I'm hoping I'm clear enough, ask if you don't understand something