A: square nonsingular matrix with the SVD A=UΣV^T Find smallest matrix E(as measured in the 2-norm), with the property that A-E is singular.
2026-03-31 08:10:50.1774944650
Find smallest matrix E(as measured in the 2-norm), with the property that A-E is singular
132 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in SVD
- Singular values by QR decomposition
- Are reduced SVD and truncated SVD the same thing?
- Clarification on the SVD of a complex matrix
- Sufficient/necessary condition for submatrix determinant (minor) that decreases with size?
- Intuitive explanation of the singular values
- SVD of matrix plus diagonal matrix and inversed
- Fitting a sum of exponentials using SVD
- Solution to least squares problem
- Are all three matrices in Singular Value Decomposition orthornormal?
- Solving linear system to find weights in $[0,1]$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Hint: Consider $E$ of the form $U \tilde{\Sigma} V^\top$ for some different diagonal matrix $\tilde{\Sigma}$. Among all such $E$ of this form that make $A-E$ singular, the smallest possible $2$-norm of $E$ will be $\sigma_{\min}(A)$. This will correspond to $\tilde{\Sigma}$ having all zero diagonal entries except a $\sigma_{\min}(A)$ in the same position as $\sigma_{\min}(A)$ in $A$.
Hint 2: It remains to show that if we consider arbitrary $E$, we still cannot find one with a smaller $2$-norm than the one explicitly constructed above. To do this, note that a Weyl inequality (see Exercise 22(iv) here) implies $$\sigma_{\min}(A) = |\sigma_{\min}(A-E) - \sigma_{\min}(A)| \le \|E\|_2.$$ (I am not certain if we need to appeal to Weyl's inequality to answer this question, so I am curious if there are simpler alternative approaches.)
Update: In Hint 2, I cited a rather strong result (Weyl inequality). But if we are looking at the minimum singular value (rather than the $i$th singular value), the inequality above can be proved directly, as shown here.