I'm having issues with this problem. I have solved for the eigenvalues but am having trouble finding the bases for both eigenvalues. The pictures below contain my work for solving for the eigenvalues and I solved for one of the basis but I think it is incorrect so I stopped. Can someone please help me. Thanks



I think I know where you made a mistake; when you calculated $A-(2+\sqrt{3}*i)I$ , you wrote that the term on the up-left was $(\sqrt{3}*i-1)$ whereas it was $(-\sqrt{3}*i-1) $, you could have tried anything from there it would have been confusing at best :).
I'll show you a practical way of dealing with this:
Calculate $B=A-(2+\sqrt{3}*i)I $
B = $\left( \begin{array}{ccc} {-1-i*\sqrt{3}}&2\\ -2&{1-i*\sqrt{3}}\\ \end{array}\right) $ = $ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} {-2*e^{\frac{i\pi}{3}}}&2\\ -2&{2*e^{\frac{-i\pi}{3}}}\\ \end{array}\right) $
$ -2*e^{\frac{i\pi}{3}}*e^{\frac{-i\pi}{3}} = -2*e^{0} = -2 $
$ -2*e^{\frac{-i\pi}{3}} = -(2*e^{\frac{-i\pi}{3}}) $
Let $C_1$ be the left column of B, $C_2$ the other. An eigenvector of A relatively to this eigenvalue is a vector of ker(B) by definition. So if this vector is written:
$ x_o = \begin{bmatrix} a \\ b \\ \end{bmatrix} $
Then you have : $aC_1 + bC_2 = B*x = 0$
$ e^{\frac{-i\pi}{3}}*C_1 = -C_2 $ from the two calculus above so an eigenvector for the eigenvalue 2+$i*\sqrt{3}$ is : $x_1 = \begin{bmatrix} e^{\frac{-i\pi}{3}} \\ 1 \\ \end{bmatrix}$
The same calculus goes for the other eigenvalue, with :
$ B = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} {-1+i*\sqrt{3}}&2\\ -2&{1+i*\sqrt{3}}\\ \end{array}\right) $ = $ \left( \begin{array}{ccc} {2*e^{\frac{2i\pi}{3}}}&2\\ -2&{2*e^{\frac{i\pi}{3}}}\\ \end{array}\right) $
you get : $x_2 = \begin{bmatrix} e^{\frac{i\pi}{3}} \\ 1 \\ \end{bmatrix} $
I think this technique is not very complicated, and quite useful because often you can see visually what will be the good combination that gives a$C_1$ +b$C_2$ =0 Trouble comes when the eigenvalue has a subspace of dimension 1 when the eigenvalue has an order of 2 in the characteristic polynomial for instance. In such cases, you can look for the same technic but using the transposed matrix and a null combination of the ligns of the matrix because of orthogonal spaces, especially when the size of the matrix is 3.