Given the Probabilists' Hermite differential equation: $$U''-xU'+\lambda U=0\tag{1}$$
A book question asks me to:
Find the first $4$ polynomial solutions (for $\lambda = 0,1,2,3$), each normalised such that the highest power of $x$ has a coefficient of unity.
So I substituted $$U=\sum_{n=0}^{\lambda}C_nx^n\tag{2}$$ into $(1)$ and equated coefficients of $x^n$ to get the recursion relation: $$C_{n+2}=\frac{(n-\lambda)}{(n+1)(n+2)}C_n$$
So I am looking to find the values of the coefficients $C_0,C_1,C_2$ for $$U=\sum_{n=0}^{3}C_nx^n=C_0+C_1x+C_2x^2+x^3$$ where we are given that $\color{blue}{C_3}=1$.
Using the recursion relation I find that for $(n=0, \lambda=2)$: $$C_2=-C_0$$ and for $(n=1, \lambda=3)$: $$\color{blue}{C_3}=-\frac13C_1\implies C_1=-3$$
This is as far as I can get to in this question.
The book answer simply states:
Using the recurrence relations, and setting the coefficient of the highest power to $1$, $U_0=1, \,U_1=x,\, U_2=x^2-1\,$ and $U_3=x^3-3x$
I know from this page on Wikipedia that the book answer is right, but the answer is not very helpful to me as I have no idea why $U_0=1$. Does this mean that $C_0=1$, if so how did the author deduce this from the recursion relation? I showed that $C_1$ is equal to $-3$. So why is $U_1\ne-3x$? The same misunderstanding follows for $U_2$ and $U_3$. In fact I don't understand why $U_3$ doesn't contain an $x^2$ term and a constant term. Also, where is the $x$ term in $U_2$ and the constant term in $U_1$?
I have only just started reading about Hermite polynomials so my understanding is very weak (apologies).
Is there any chance someone could explain as simply as possible how to obtain $U_0,U_1,U_2,U_3$?
Thank you.
Two aspects: One addresses the recurrence relation, the other the different polynomial solutions.
We observe due to the special structure of the recurrence relation that once we have determined $C_0$, we can calculate all evenly indexed values, and once we have determined $C_1$, we can calculate all oddly indexed value. \begin{align*} C_0&\qquad\rightarrow\qquad C_2, C_4, C_6, \ldots\\ C_1&\qquad\rightarrow\qquad C_3, C_5, C_7, \ldots\\ \end{align*}
Notes:
We observe that the recurrence relation (2) is not that helpful for small values of $\lambda$, since for $\lambda=0,1,2$ the calculation consists of determination of the initial values only. Just in the case $\lambda=3$ we could obtain $C_2^{(3)}$ from the initial value $C_0^{(3)}=0$.
Nevertheless will the recurrence relation show its strength with increasing $\lambda$. It's also interesting to see that the coefficients depend oddly and evenly indexed from the the initial values.
The nice fact that evenly indexed polynomials $U_{2\lambda}$ are even functions and oddly indexed polynomials $U_{2\lambda+1}$ are odd functions has to be analysed separately.