To find the $\log $ of $a=be^c $ I am not sure but I suppose this is how it goes .. $\log a = \log b + c \log e $ i.e. $\log a=\log b + c $ But I am a bit confused about the base quantity What comes at base Is it $10 $ or $e$ ??
2026-04-02 19:10:31.1775157031
Find the logarithmic
44 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LOGARITHMS
- Confirmation of Proof: $\forall n \in \mathbb{N}, \ \pi (n) \geqslant \frac{\log n}{2\log 2}$
- Extracting the S from formula
- How to prove the following inequality (log)
- Rewriting $(\log_{11}5)/(\log_{11} 15)$
- How to solve this equation with $x$ to a logarithmic power?
- Show that $\frac{1}{k}-\ln\left(\frac{k+1}{k}\right)$ is bounded by $\frac{1}{k^2}$
- Why do we add 1 to logarithms to get number of digits?
- Is my method correct for to prove $a^{\log_b c} = c^{\log_b a}$?
- How to prove the inequality $\frac{1}{n}+\frac{1}{n+1}+\cdots+\frac{1}{2n-1}\geq \log (2)$?
- Unusual Logarithm Problem
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It's stated in the comments that your equation assumes that the base of the logarithm is $e$. I'd like to expand on them and provide a method for what to do when that isn't true.
First, notice that once you took the logarithm of both sides you had:
$$log(a) = log(be^c)$$
You used the rules of logarithms but skipped too many steps. You should get:
$$log(a) = log(b) + log(e^c) = log(b) + clog(e)$$
This is about as far as you can get if you don't know what the base of the logarithm is. However, you turned it into:
$$log(a) = log(b) + log(e^c) = log(b) + c$$
This implicitly assumes that the base must be $e$, since you let $log(e) = 1$. Since you can't take logarithms of an equation with mixed bases without appropriately changing the base, the answer is that your logarithms are all base $e$.
On the other hand, if your question explicitly stated that the logarithm had to be base 10, and you'd like to further simplify, then you'd have to change the base. In order to do that, you would use the formula:
$$log_b(a) = \frac{log_c(a)}{log_c(b)}$$
In this case, it would mean dividing both sides by $log_{10}(e)$ in order to change the base into base $e$.