Given $d, n \in \mathbb{N}$ and $x_k, y_k \in \mathbb{R}^d$, for $1 \leq k \leq n$, we want to find $\arg \max_{A: ||A||_2 = 1} \sum_k \langle x_k, A y_k \rangle$, where $||\cdot||_2$ denotes spectral norm. I can see that this is a linear combination of $A_{ij}$'s, where the coefficient of $A_{ij}$ is $\sum_k (x_k)_i (y_k)_j$. But I cannot proceed further.
2026-03-25 12:53:09.1774443189
Find the matrix maximizing a summation of bilinear forms
54 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in INNER-PRODUCTS
- Inner Product Same for all Inputs
- How does one define an inner product on the space $V=\mathbb{Q}_p^n$?
- Inner Product Uniqueness
- Is the natural norm on the exterior algebra submultiplicative?
- Norm_1 and dot product
- Is Hilbert space a Normed Space or a Inner Product Space? Or it have to be both at the same time?
- Orthonormal set and linear independence
- Inner product space and orthogonal complement
- Which Matrix is an Inner Product
- Proof Verification: $\left\|v-\frac{v}{\|v\|}\right\|= \min\{\|v-u\|:u\in S\}$
Related Questions in SPECTRAL-NORM
- Operator norm calculation for simple matrix
- Is the spectral norm of the Jacobian of an $M$-Lipschitz function bounded by $M$?
- Does Lipschitz-continuous gradient imply that the Hessian is bounded in spectral norm by the same Lipschitz constant?
- Spectral norm minimization
- Gradient of the spectral norm of a matrix
- Is it possible to upper bound this family of matrices in operator norm?
- The spectral norm of real matrices with positive entries is increasing in its entries?
- Computing the spectral norm of a projection matrix
- Fastest converging algorithm for computing spectral radius of symmetric matrix
- $2$-norm of a Vandermonde matrix
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $X$ be the matrix whose $j$-th column for each $j$ is $x_j$ and define $Y$ analogously. Let $U\Sigma V^T$ be a singular value decomposition of $XY^T$ and let $B=U^TAV$. Then $\|A\|_2=\|B\|_2$. Also, when $\|B\|_2=1$, the norm of every column of $B$ must be $\le1$. In particular, we have $|b_{kk}|\le 1$ for each $k$. Therefore $$ \begin{align} \max_{\|A\|_2=1}\sum_k\langle x_k,Ay_k\rangle &=\max_{\|A\|_2=1}\langle XY^T,A\rangle_F\\ &=\max_{\|A\|_2=1}\langle U\Sigma V^T,A\rangle_F\\ &=\max_{\|B\|_2=1}\langle \Sigma,B\rangle_F\tag{1}\\ &=\max_{\|B\|_2=1}\sum_k\sigma_kb_{kk}\\ &\le\max_{\|B\|_2=1}\sum_k\sigma_k\quad(\because |b_{kk}|\le1)\tag{2}\\ &=\|\Sigma\|_{\mathrm{tr}}\\ &=\|XY^T\|_{\mathrm{tr}} \end{align} $$ where $\|\cdot\|_\mathrm{tr}$ denotes the trace norm (a.k.a. nuclear norm or Schatten $1$-norm) of a matrix. Clearly, equality holds in $(2)$ above when $b_{11}=\cdots=b_{dd}=1$. Therefore $B=I$ is an optimal solution to the transformed problem $(1)$ (and such it is the only solution if $XY^T$ is nonsingular), $A=UV^T$ is an optimal solution to the original optimisation problem, and the maximum objective function value is $\|XY^T\|_{\mathrm{tr}}$.