I need to find the UMVUE of $\theta^k= P(X_1=1,...,X_k=1)$, where $k = 1,...,n$, given a random sample from $Bernoulli(1,\theta)$. I suppose that an unbiased estimator of $\theta^k$ could be $T_1$, taking value $1$, if $X_1=...=X_k=1$, and $0$ otherwise. Also $T=\sum X_i$ is a sufficient statistic. Also, based on Lehmann-Scheffe theorem and Rao-Blackwell, if i find $E(T_1|T)$, this should be the UMVUE of $\theta^k$. However, i have problem calculating $E(T_1|T)$. Can anyone proceed? I have already done the following: $E(T_1|T)=0*(T_1=0|T=t) +1*P(T_1=1|T=t) $ = $P(T_1=1|T=t) = P(X_1=...=X_k=1|\sum X_i=t)$. From there, Bayes theorem can be applied, and this is where i am stuck on how to proceed.
2026-02-23 06:41:04.1771828864
Find UMVUE of $\theta^k= P(X_1=1,...,X_k=1)$, where $k = 1,...,n$, given a random sample from Bernoulli$(1,\theta)$
214 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in STATISTICAL-INFERENCE
- co-variance matrix of discrete multivariate random variable
- Question on completeness of sufficient statistic.
- Probability of tossing marbles,covariance
- Estimate the square root of the success probability of a Binomial Distribution.
- A consistent estimator for theta is?
- Using averages to measure the dispersion of data
- Confidence when inferring p in a binomial distribution
- A problem on Maximum likelihood estimator of $\theta$
- Derive unbiased estimator for $\theta$ when $X_i\sim f(x\mid\theta)=\frac{2x}{\theta^2}\mathbb{1}_{(0,\theta)}(x)$
- Show that $\max(X_1,\ldots,X_n)$ is a sufficient statistic.
Related Questions in PARAMETER-ESTIMATION
- Question on completeness of sufficient statistic.
- Estimate the square root of the success probability of a Binomial Distribution.
- A consistent estimator for theta is?
- Estimating the mean of a Poisson distribution
- A problem on Maximum likelihood estimator of $\theta$
- The Linear Regression model is computed well only with uncorrelated variables
- Derive unbiased estimator for $\theta$ when $X_i\sim f(x\mid\theta)=\frac{2x}{\theta^2}\mathbb{1}_{(0,\theta)}(x)$
- Is there an intuitive way to see that $\mathbb{E}[X|Y]$ is the least squares estimator of $X$ given $Y$?
- Consistent estimator for Poisson distribution
- estimation of $\mu$ in a Gaussian with set confidence interval
Related Questions in BERNOULLI-DISTRIBUTION
- Bound for sum of iid Bernoulli distributions
- Decompose integrable probability measure into Bernoulli distribution
- Finding the distribution of a random variable that is determined by a Bernoulli random variable
- Correlation of a binomial RV with itself
- Probabilities to have $x$ women in a four-person committee
- Probability of blue and red ball
- Tail probability of summation of (possibly dependent) Bernoulli variables
- Showing that randomness is undesired for prediction accuracy
- Estimate minimum number of repititions in Bernoulli trial
- how many trials required to make sure the relative frequency of an even falls within bound
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If $k=n$ and the sample consists just of $X_1,\dots,X_k$, then $T_1={\bf 1}_{\{T=k\}}$ is a function of $T$, so $E(T_1 | T)=T_1$, and $T_1$ itself is the desired UMVUE for $\theta^k$.
Next, consider the more interesting case where $n>k$ and and $T=\sum_{i=1}^n X_i$. For every set $S \subset \{1,\dots, n\}$ with $|S|=k$, define $T_S:=\prod_{i \in S} X_i$. By symmetry, $E(T_S|T)=E(T_1|T)=\theta^k$ for every such set $S$. Thus $$T_*:={n \choose k}^{-1}\sum_{|S|=k} T_S $$ satisfies $E(T_*|T)=E(T_1|T)$ as well. Finally, observe that ${n \choose k} T_*$ counts the number of subsets of size $k$ of the set $\{i \le n: X_i=1\},$ so $$T_*:={n \choose k}^{-1} {T \choose k} $$ is a function of $T$. Therefore, $$E(T_1|T)=E(T_*|T)=T_* \,,$$ and $T_*$ is the desired UMVUE for $\theta^k$.