Finding Preto Optimal allocation if utlities are of the form $u_1=x_{11}x_{12}$ and $u_2=2x_{21}+x_{22}$

242 Views Asked by At

There are two persons and two goods in an exchange economy. Initial endowment is $$ \omega = (\omega_1,\omega_2) =\left((1,0),(0,1)\right)$$

The utilities of two agents are given by:
$$\begin{cases}u_1&=&x_{11}x_{12} \\u_2&=&2x_{21}+x_{22}\end{cases}$$ where $x$ is the allocation such that $x=\left((x_{11},x_{12}),(x_{21},x_{22})\right)$
and $x_{11}+x_{21}=1$ and $x_{12}+x_{22}=1$ i.e. non wasteful allocation. What will be the Pareto optimal allocation?

I tried to find Pareto Optimal allocation using hit and trial but it is not coming. Is there any general way to find Pareto Optimal allocation for utilities of above kind?

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

The 2 conditions for person 1 are:

$\Large{\frac{\frac{\partial U_1}{\partial x_{11}}}{\frac{\partial U_2}{\partial x_{12}}}=\normalsize\frac{p_1}{p_2}}\quad \normalsize(1)$

$p_1x_{11}+p_2x_{12}=1\cdot p_1+0\cdot p_2\quad (2)$

At the beginning $x_{11}=1$ and $x_{12}=0$. That is the reason why the RHS looks like this.

$\frac{x_{12}}{x_{11}}=\frac{p_1}{p_2}\Rightarrow p_1x_{11}=p_2x_{12}$

Inserting the expression for $p_2x_{12}$ in (2):

$p_1x_{11}+p_1x_{11}=1\cdot p_1+0\cdot p_2$

$2p_1x_{11}=1p_1\Rightarrow x_{11}=\frac{1}{2}$

Now you can use the given equation $x_{11}+x_{21}=1$.

It is obvious that $x_{21}=\frac{1}{2}$


The 2 conditions for person 2 are:

$\Large{\frac{\frac{\partial U_2}{\partial x_{21}}}{\frac{\partial U_2}{\partial x_{22}}}=\normalsize\frac{p_1}{p_2}}\quad \normalsize(3)$

$p_1x_{21}+p_2x_{22}=0\cdot p_1+1\cdot p_2\quad (4)$

The calculations are similar to the calculations above.

0
On

In the given exchange economy, set of feasible allocations is given by

$\mathcal{F} = \left\{((x_{11},x_{12}),(x_{21},x_{22}))\in\mathbb{R}^2_+\times\mathbb{R}^2_+|x_{11}+x_{21}=1 \ \wedge \ x_{12}+x_{22}=1\right\}$

and set of Pareto optimal allocations is given by

$\mathcal{E} = \left\{((x_{11},x_{12}),(x_{21},x_{22}))\in\mathcal{F}|x_{12}=\min(2x_{11},1)\right\}$

enter image description here