Let $\{e_k\}_{k=1}^2$ denote the canonical orthonormal basis in $\mathbb{C}^2$. Put $\{f_k\}_{k=1}^4 = \{e_1, e_2, e_1-e_2, e_1 + e_2\}$. Clearly we have a representation of $e_1$ in terms of $\{f_k\}_{k=1}^4$. I am interested in finding $$m = \inf\left\{\sum_{k=1}^4 |c_k|: e_1 = \sum_{k=1}^4 c_kf_k\right\}.$$ Clearly $m \leq 1$ since we can take $c_1 = 1$ and $c_2 = c_3 = c_4 = 0$. However, I believe that $m = 1$. To show this assume that we have $$e_1 = \sum_{k=1}^4 c_kf_k,$$ for some $\{c_k\}_{k=1}^4$. How can I show that $$\sum_{k=1}^4 |c_k| \geq 1?$$
2026-02-23 08:58:00.1771837080
Finding the infimum of summable sequences in a decomposition
37 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in FRAME-THEORY
- What is $\sum_k|\langle f,f_k\rangle|^2<\infty$ for all $f\in H$ a sufficient condition for a sequence to be a Bessel sequence?
- If a frame has upper frame bound $B$, why does the synthesis operator $T$ satisfy $\|T\|\le \sqrt B$?
- In a frame, the closure of the intersection contains the closure of one sublocale intersect the other open sublocale
- Condition for maximal filter of a lattice to be completely prime
- Names of definitions in frames/locales/topologies
- Does sequence of monomials form a Frame in $L^2[0,1]$?
- Finding the infimum of summable sequences in a decomposition
- If $\{f_1,f_2,...\}$ a given frame, $T$ a bounded linear, prove that $(Tf,f)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty |(f,f_n)|^2$.
- Infer $||Tf||^2\leq B^2 ||f||^2$ from frame definition.
- A characterization of Bessel sequences in a Hilbert space
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is a way to do it!
You can first solve the linear system of equations: that will let you find the coefficients for linear combinations of your generators that result in $e_1$.
For that, first solve for $e_1$, for example $e_1=f_1$, and then solve the homogeneous equation to see all possible solutions.
I got the following solution for the homogeneous equation: $$0 = \alpha (f_1 + f_2 - f_3) + \beta(f_1 - f_2 - f_4) \forall \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{C}.$$
Now note that if $e_1 = \sum_{c=1}^{4} c_i f_i$ then we have that we can equivalently suppose that the $c_i$ are of the form: $$c_1 = 1 + \alpha - \beta, \\ c_2 = \alpha - \beta, \\ c_3 = -\alpha, \text{ and}\\ c_4 = - \beta.$$
Now you can replace each $c_i$ by these expressions and minimize over $\alpha$ and $\beta$ instead.
However, note that $$|c_1| + |c_2| + |c_3| + |c_4| \geq \\ (1 - |\alpha| - |\beta|) + |\alpha - \beta| + |\alpha| + |\beta| = \\ 1 + |\alpha - \beta| \geq 1$$ which in combination with the fact that the sum is $1$ when $\alpha=\beta=0$ proves your affirmation is true.