Let $A$ be a commutative ring with $1$. Suppose that every module $M$ over $A$ is finitely.generated with rank $n$ and every submodule $N \leq M$ has rank $r \leq n$. Show $A$ is a principal ideal domain. I do not how having a finite base is related to being a module over a commutative ring with $1$.
2026-03-28 15:18:43.1774711123
Finitely-Generated modules over a commutative ring with $1$.
38 Views Asked by user1120269 https://math.techqa.club/user/user1120269/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RING-THEORY
- Jacobson radical = nilradical iff every open set of $\text{Spec}A$ contains a closed point.
- A commutative ring is prime if and only if it is a domain.
- Find gcd and invertible elements of a ring.
- Prove that $R[x]$ is an integral domain if and only if $R$ is an integral domain.
- Prove that $Z[i]/(5)$ is not a field. Check proof?
- If $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x;\delta]$ such as $P\cap R=\{0\}$, is $P(Q[x;\delta])$ also prime?
- Let $R$ be a simple ring having a minimal left ideal $L$. Then every simple $R$-module is isomorphic to $L$.
- A quotient of a polynomial ring
- Does a ring isomorphism between two $F$-algebras must be a $F$-linear transformation
- Prove that a ring of fractions is a local ring
Related Questions in MODULES
- Idea to make tensor product of two module a module structure
- $(2,1+\sqrt{-5}) \not \cong \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$-module
- Example of simple modules
- $R$ a domain subset of a field $K$. $I\trianglelefteq R$, show $I$ is a projective $R$-module
- $S_3$ action on the splitting field of $\mathbb{Q}[x]/(x^3 - x - 1)$
- idempotent in quiver theory
- Isomorphism of irreducible R-modules
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Exercise 15.10 in Cox's Book (first part)
- direct sum of injective hull of two modules is equal to the injective hull of direct sum of those modules
Related Questions in PRINCIPAL-IDEAL-DOMAINS
- Principal Ideal Ring which is not Integral
- A variation of the argument to prove that $\{m/n:n \text{ is odd },n,m \in \mathbb{Z}\}$ is a PID
- Why is this element irreducible?
- Quotient of normal ring by principal ideal
- $R/(a) \oplus R/(b) \cong R/\gcd(a,b) \oplus R/\operatorname{lcm}(a,b) $
- Proving a prime ideal is maximal in a PID
- Localization of PID, if DVR, is a localization at a prime ideal
- Structure theorem for modules implies Smith Normal Form
- Let R be a PID, B a torsion R module and p a prime in R. Prove that if $pb=0$ for some non zero b in B, then $\text{Ann}(B)$ is a subset of (p)
- Why can't a finitely generated module over a PID be generated by fewer elements than the number of invariant factors?
Related Questions in FREE-MODULES
- projective module which is a submodule of a finitely generated free module
- Flat modules over a PID
- On the generators of free $R$-modules.
- Is the linear dual of a cyclic $K[G]$-module $K[G]$-cyclic
- Is the quotient of a tensor product by a group a free module
- Cardinality of quotient group
- Why is a Nonzero Ideal of $\mathcal{O}_K$ Free of Rank $n$?
- Splitting two exact sequences in a compatible way
- When is every direct product of a ring also a free module?
- How does this commutative triangle arises in the idea of freely generated things?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The premise "Suppose that every module $M$ over $A$ is finitely generated..." doesn't make sense since you can't demand all modules are finitely generated: consider $M = \bigoplus_{n \geq 1} A$, which is not finitely generated (except for the silly case where $A$ is the zero ring).
What you meant to say is "Suppose every module $M$ over $A$ that is finitely generated...". In other words, it is an assumption on all finitely generated $A$-modules, not on all $A$-modules. And when you say "... every submodule $N \subset M$ has rank $r \leq n$" did you mean "... every submodule $N \subset M$ is free of rank $r \leq n$"?
If you are assuming every finitely generated $A$-module is free and their submodules are also free of rank no greater than the rank of the starting module, then just look at the example of the $A$-module $A$ itself (free of rank $1$), whose submodules are its ideals to deduce that (i) all ideals are principal and (ii) $A$ is an integral domain.