$\forall x\ \forall y\ P(x,y) \to \forall x\ \forall y\ P(y,x)$
Is this a tautology?
Is there a set method that we can use to find whether a wff is a tautology?
$\forall x\ \forall y\ P(x,y) \to \forall x\ \forall y\ P(y,x)$
Is this a tautology?
Is there a set method that we can use to find whether a wff is a tautology?
Copyright © 2021 JogjaFile Inc.
If with the term tautology you mean also a valid formula of first-order logic, the answer is : YES.
In general, we have that : $\forall x \forall y \varphi$ and $\forall y \forall x \varphi$ are equivalent.
Thus, $∀x∀y P(x,y) \to ∀x∀y P(y,x)$ is equivalent to $∀x∀y P(x,y) \to ∀y∀x P(y,x)$.
In addition, you can "rename" the bounded variable without chenging the "meaning" of a formula, and thus $∀y∀x P(y,x)$ is equivalent to : $∀x∀y P(x,y)$.
In conclusion, the initial formula is equivalent to :
which is valid (it is an instance of the tautology : $p \to p$).
You can prove it "formally" with a Natural Deduction derivation of :