We drop a flea on a point of the coordinate system(with integer coordinates). Due to the dimensions of the flea we can not see it. The flea jumps away every second by one unit (always in the same direction). We can choose a point every second and if the flea is on that point at that perticular second we have caught it. Is it possible to catch the flea in infinitely many steps?
2026-04-04 13:17:32.1775308652
Flea on the coordinate system
236 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COORDINATE-SYSTEMS
- How to change a rectangle's area based on it's 4 coordinates?
- How to find 2 points in line?
- Am I right or wrong in this absolute value?
- Properties of a eclipse on a rotated plane to see a perfect circle from the original plane view?
- inhomogeneous coordinates to homogeneous coordinates
- Find the distance of the point $(7,1)$ from the line $3x+4y=4$ measured parallel to the line $3x-5y+2=0.$
- A Problem Based on Ellipse
- Convert a vector in Lambert Conformal Conical Projection to Cartesian
- Archimedean spiral in cartesian coordinates
- How to find the area of the square $|ABCD|$?
Related Questions in INFINITY
- Does Planck length contradict math?
- No two sided limit exists
- Are these formulations correct?
- Are these numbers different from each other?
- What is wrong in my analysis?
- Where does $x$ belong to?
- Divide by zero on Android
- Why is the set of all infinite binary sequences uncountable but the set of all natural numbers are countable?
- Is a set infinite if there exists a bijection between the topological space X and the set?
- Infinitesimal Values
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
If our strategy is to stay still and always check the same coordinate, then we will have 50% chance of catching the flea. Not ideal.
Perhaps more effective a plan, I go arbitrarily far (approaching *infinity) to the positive (right) side of the number line to check. Then the next second I will pick a spot equally far from 0 on the negative (left) side of the number line, such that the flea is necessarily between these two points. Third, I check the coordinate 1 to the right of my first coordinate, and fourth, I check one further to the left of my second coordinate. In this way I continue, getting further and further from 0, alternating halves of the number line. I am progressing 1 coordinate every 2 seconds in either direction, whereas the the flea is moving twice as fast, moving 1 coordinate every second in only one direction, so eventually (in an infinite amount of time) it will catch up to where I am checking. There comes a point where either I catch the flea, or it is on the coordinate closer to 0 by 1 spot than the coordinate I just checked. I then look back on the other side of the number line as the flea jumps into the space I just checked. Finally, I come back to the side of the number line next to the flea, move 1 coordinate further from 0 just like the flea does, and ultimately capture it.
I have a feeling we have to assert the axiom of choice to solve the problem in this way though, where the axiom of choice is stated as:
$$\forall X[\varnothing\notin X\Rightarrow\exists f:(X\rightarrow\bigcup X)\space\space\forall A\in X(f(A)\in A)]$$
Where the arbitrary set A = {integers (coordinates in 1-D)}, X is the set of sets of the form of A, one copy for each second we spend trying to catch the flea, and f(A) is the specific coordinate we choose to search at any given second. Since we take an infinite amount of time, X is an infinitely large set, and because we are also trying to take exactly one element of each element of X, we must have access to the axiom of choice, otherwise we are not assured the existence of f. The empty set is not an element of X, so the axiom applies.
*All infinities except the one starred are countably large.