In my previous question, I asked how one could say that the elements of the $p$-th singular chain group with coefficients in an abelian group, $\Delta_p(X;G) := \Delta_p \otimes_{\mathbb Z} G$, $G \in \mathsf {Ab}$, can be written as formal sums $$\sum_\sigma a_\sigma \sigma,$$ where $a_\sigma \in G$. In the comments, with the help of peter a g, I arrived at the conclusion that $$\Delta_p(X;G) \simeq \bigoplus_{i\in I}G,$$ where $I$ is the set of all singular $p$-simplices on $X \in \mathsf {Top}$. My question is now, how do we identify the direct sum above with the set of formal $G$-linear combinations of $p$-simplices?
2026-03-27 02:59:33.1774580373
Follow up question about homology with coefficients
99 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ALGEBRAIC-TOPOLOGY
- How to compute homology group of $S^1 \times S^n$
- the degree of a map from $S^2$ to $S^2$
- Show $f$ and $g$ are both homeomorphism mapping of $T^2$ but $f$ is not homotopy equivalent with $g.$
- Chain homotopy on linear chains: confusion from Hatcher's book
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- a problem related with path lifting property
- Bott and Tu exercise 6.5 - Reducing the structure group of a vector bundle to $O(n)$
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- CW-structure on $S^n$ and orientations
Related Questions in HOMOLOGY-COHOMOLOGY
- Are these cycles boundaries?
- Cohomology groups of a torus minus a finite number of disjoint open disks
- $f$ - odd implies $d(f)$ - odd, question to the proof
- Poincarè duals in complex projective space and homotopy
- understanding proof of excision theorem
- proof of excision theorem: commutativity of a diagram
- exact sequence of reduced homology groups
- Doubts about computation of the homology of $\Bbb RP^2$ in Vick's *Homology Theory*
- the quotien space of $ S^1\times S^1$
- Rational points on conics over fields of dimension 1
Related Questions in FREE-ABELIAN-GROUP
- Help resolving this contradiction in descriptions of the fundamental groups of the figure eight and n-torus
- Is it true that $(\mathbb{Z}\bigoplus\mathbb{Z}\bigoplus\mathbb{Z})/(\mathbb{Z}\bigoplus\mathbb{Z})\cong\mathbb{Z}$
- What is the definition of a free abelian group generated by the set $X$?
- Invariant factor decomposition of $\mathbb{Z}_6 \otimes_{\mathbb{Z}} \mathbb{Z}_9$
- Bases of Subgroups of Infinitely Generated Free Abelian Groups
- Question on the definition of Free Abelian Groups
- Taking a basis from an old basis in Free Abelian Groups
- Show that $G/2G \cong (\mathbb{Z}/2)^n$, where $G$ is an abelian group and $G \cong \mathbb{Z}^n$
- Taking free abelian groups "commutes" with quotient by equivalence relation
- Conditions under which a union of free abelian groups is free
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
You've said that you've arrived at the conclusion that $\Delta_p(X;G) \cong \bigoplus_{i \in I} G$. That is, to each singular simplex $\sigma$, we assign a copy of $G$. An element of this direct sum is given by choosing an element of $G$ for each $i$, such that only finitely many of the elements chosen are non-zero. In other words, each element gives us a function $I \to G$, where only finitely many of the image of $I$ are non-zero. We can call this function $g:I \to G$ and denote $g(i) = g_i$.
Now, for each element in $\Delta_p$, you can write the corresponding formal sum by $\sum g(i) i = \sum g_i i$. The formal sum really is just associating each simplex with its weight in $G$.
As I mentioned in my comments above, this is no different than looking at $(a,b,c) \mapsto ae_1 + be_2 + ce_3$.
I think you may be looking too hard into the "multiplication" $g \cdot \sigma$. It really is just a weight / a "formal" multiplication. A free $G$-module by definition is just the $G$-module generated by a set, so the module multiplication is just putting them next to each other.
In the $\mathbb{Z}$ case, $3 \sigma$ doesn't mean much either. You can think of it as 3 copies of the simplex, but in the same way you can think of $g$ copies fo the simplex in a formal sense.