For a martingale $X$ does uniform integrability imply integrability of $\sup |X_{n}|$?

864 Views Asked by At

All is in the title: if $(X_{n})$ is a uniformly integrable martingale is it true that $\sup_{n\in \mathbb{N}} |X_{n}|$ is an integrable variable ?

If I had to take a guess I'd say the answer is no, but I haven't managed to construct a counter-example. I know that if you strengthen the hypothesis to $(X_{n})$ being $L^{p}$-bounded for $p>1$ the claim is true (it follows from Doob's maximal inequality), and that if you don't assume that $X_{n}$ is a martingale then the claim is false.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

Saz pointed out that Exercise II.3.15 in Revuz and Yor's Brownian motion and continuous martingales gives a negative answer to my question. Here's the counterexample, adapted to a discrete martingale for the sake of variety.

Consider a partition $(A_{k})_{k\geqslant 1}$ of a probability space $\Omega$. Let $(\alpha_{k})$ be any sequence of positive real numbers and set \begin{equation*} X_{\infty}=\sum_{k} \alpha_{k}\mathbf{1}_{A_{k}}. \end{equation*} This variable is integrable iff the series $S=\sum \alpha_{k}\mathbf{P}(A_{k})$ converges to a finite limit. Assume it is the case, and set $S_{n}$ for its partial sums, also let $P_{n}=\sum_{k=n}^{+\infty}\mathbf{P}(A_{k})$.

If we define $\mathcal{F}_{n}=\sigma(A_{k},k\leqslant n)$ and set $X_{n}=\mathbf{E}(X_{\infty}\mid \mathcal{F}_{n})$ we obtain a martingale for which we have the explicit expression \begin{equation*} X_{n}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\alpha_{k}\mathbf{1}_{A_{k}} + \frac{S-S_{n}}{P_n}\mathbf{1}_{\cup_{k> n}A_{k}} \end{equation*} so that \begin{equation*} \sup_{n\in\mathbb{N}} X_{n} \geqslant \sum_{k} \frac{S-S_{k}}{P_{k}}\mathbf{1}_{A_{k}}. \end{equation*}

One checks using the convergence criterion for Bertrand series that if $\mathbf{P}(A_{n})=\frac{1}{n(n+1)}$ and $\alpha_{n}=\frac{n}{\ln^{2}(n)}$ then indeed $S < +\infty$ but $||\sup_{n\in\mathbb{N}}X_{n}||_{1}=+\infty$.