How do I give a formal proof that $e^x$ is not algebraic, like for example: $$\sum_{n\geq0}\frac{x^n}{n!}\notin\mathbb{C}_{\mathrm{alg}}[[x]]$$ Help appreciated!
2026-03-26 11:07:15.1774523235
Formal proof that $e^x$ is not algebraic
1.6k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in EXPONENTIAL-FUNCTION
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- derive the expectation of exponential function $e^{-\left\Vert \mathbf{x} - V\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{a}\right\Vert^2}$ or its upper bound
- How do you calculate the horizontal asymptote for a declining exponential?
- Intersection points of $2^x$ and $x^2$
- Integrate exponential over shifted square root
- Unusual Logarithm Problem
- $f'(x)=af(x) \Rightarrow f(x)=e^{ax} f(0)$
- How long will it take the average person to finish a test with $X$ questions.
- The equation $e^{x^3-x} - 2 = 0$ has solutions...
- Solve for the value of k for $(1+\frac{e^k}{e^k+1})^n$
Related Questions in TRANSCENDENTAL-EQUATIONS
- Transcendental equation $x - c \sin(x)=0$
- Solve $a^x = 1-x$
- Transcendental equation with Bessel function
- Uniqueness of solution for transcedental equation on the open set
- How to solve equations like these?
- Solving exponential equation by hand?
- Number of roots of the equation $x\sin x-1=0$ for $x\in [0,2\pi]$
- Generalizing the Lambert W function
- Equivalence between $\phi (z,s,a)$ and a sum of single impulses
- Issue solving an equation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The notation $\mathbb C_{\mathrm{alg}}[[x]]$ is a bit unorthodox, but I presume what is meant is the algebraic closure of $\mathbb C(x)$ in $\mathbb C((x)).$
One way is to think about the rate of growth at infinity. Suppose that $e^{nx} + p_{n-1}(x) e^{(n-1)x} + \cdots + p_1(x) e^x + p_0(x) = 0$ for some rational functions $p_i$. Now divide by $e^{nx}$, to get $1 + p_{n-1}(x) e^{-x} + \cdots + p_1(x)e^{-(n-1) x} + p_0(x) e^{-n x} = 0.$ Taking the limit as $x \to \infty$, using the fact that exponential decay beats the growth of any rational function, we get that $ 1 = 0$, a contradiction.
(This is related to the fact that $e^x$, thought of as a complex function, has an essential singularity at infinity, unlike algebraic functions.)