I am currently preparing for my Foundations of Logic midterm and while going through different problems I ran into this question that I just can't solve
Premises:
(1) $p \to (q \lor r)$
(2) $r \to \lnot p$
(3) $q \to s$
∴ $p \to s$
I need to prove the validity of the following argument. It doesn't seem that I can use any of the inference rules here, I also tried using material implication but it didn't get me anywhere either. Any idea how this argument can be proved?
Thanks in advance
The conclusion can only be false if $p=T$, $s=F$. There are only $4$ rows in the truth table with this assignment; just check every row which has these assignments and make sure that at least one of the premises is false. If this is the case, the argument is valid; if you find a row where all the premises are true but the conclusion false, the argument is invalid.