It is known that if $f \in L^1(\mathbb R)$, $\widehat f(\xi) \neq 0$ for any $\xi \in \mathbb R$, then for any $h \in L^1(\mathbb R)$ such that $\widehat h$ is compactly supported there exists $g \in L^1(\mathbb R)$ with $\widehat g = \frac{\widehat h}{\widehat f}$. This theorem can be found in many books. In several articles the authors also use the multidimensional version but I can't find any proof. My question is whether this theorem can be found in some book in the case of $\mathbb R^n$ (for references)?
2026-04-05 18:35:48.1775414148
Fourier transform division theorem in $\mathbb R^n$
80 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REFERENCE-REQUEST
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Random variables in integrals, how to analyze?
- Abstract Algebra Preparation
- Definition of matrix valued smooth function
- CLT for Martingales
- Almost locality of cubic spline interpolation
- Identify sequences from OEIS or the literature, or find examples of odd integers $n\geq 1$ satisfying these equations related to odd perfect numbers
- property of Lebesgue measure involving small intervals
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in HARMONIC-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Show that $x\longmapsto \int_{\mathbb R^n}\frac{f(y)}{|x-y|^{n-\alpha }}dy$ is integrable.
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- Seeking an example of Schwartz function $f$ such that $ \int_{\bf R}\left|\frac{f(x-y)}{y}\right|\ dy=\infty$
- Computing Pontryagin Duals
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Expanding $\left| [\widehat{f}( \xi + h) - \widehat{f}( \xi)]/h - [- 2 \pi i f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) \right|$ into one integral
- When does $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(x+\frac{1}{n})=f(x)$ a.e. fail
- The linear partial differential operator with constant coefficient has no solution
- Show $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}$ is isomorphic to $S^1$
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I don't have a reference for you, but I can sketch a very simple elegant proof. Of course all this is closely related to Wiener's Tauberian Theorem. A few years ago I found the proof of WTT that I'd been looking for all my life! Was all excited, then of course it turned out I'd been scooped again.
But "my" proof is the "right" proof, although it's not actually mine, and it's nearly as well known as it should be. So my vote is you give the proof instead of citing a reference, just to make the "right" argument a little better known.
CBAID = Commutative Banach Algebra with Idenity.
If only $L^1(R^n)$ had an identity. Then WTT would be trivial from the basic stuff about CBAIDs. Instead you see proofs of WTT that use techniques that remind you of the proofs of the basic CBAID theorem (summing geometric series, etc). All my life I felt it should instead be possible to get WTT directly from the CBAID stuff, instead of repeating similar arguments.
It is possible to get WTT from the basic results on CBAIDs! And the result you cite is of course the main step.
Ok, end of explanation of why the following is fascinating, and on to the following:
Say $f$ and $h$ are as you say. Let $B$ be, say, a large closed ball such that $\hat h$ is supported in a compact subset of the interior of $B$.
Let $I$ be the space of all $g\in L^1(R^n)$ such that $\hat g$ vanishes identically on $B$. Then $I$ is a closed ideal in $L^1$. So the quotient space $$A=L^1/I$$is a CBA. The big deal is that $A$ actually has an identity! Indeed, if $e\in L^1$ is such that $\hat e=1$ everywhere on $I$ then it's easy to check that $e+I$ is an identity for $A$.
So $A$ is a CBAID. And it's easy to verify that the maximal ideal space of $A$ "is" $I$, in the sense that the maps $g+I\mapsto\hat g(\xi)$ for $\xi\in B$ give all the complex homomorphisms of $A$.
So $\phi(f+I)\ne0$ for every complex homomorphism $\phi$ of $A$. Hence $f+I$ is invertible in $A$ (!). This says that there exists $g\in L^1$ with $\hat f\hat g=1$ everywhere on $B$. And now since $\hat h$ is supported in $B$ it follows that $$\hat g\hat h = \hat h/\hat f.$$
Oops, my "$g$" is not your $g$. Sorry...