I'm studying electrodynamics and am looking at Fourier transforms, especially for Greens functions. Normally, Fourier transforms are given by the following:$$G(x)=\int dk\ \tilde{G}(k)e^{ikx}$$ However, in some of the functions I'm looking at, the fourier transform is given as: $$G(t)=\int dw\ \tilde{G}(k)e^{-iwt}$$ My question is, why does the sign of the power change for the time fourier transform?
2026-03-25 15:56:51.1774454211
Fourier Transform - Electrodynamics
318 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FOURIER-ANALYSIS
- An estimate in the introduction of the Hilbert transform in Grafakos's Classical Fourier Analysis
- Verifying that translation by $h$ in time is the same as modulating by $-h$ in frequency (Fourier Analysis)
- How is $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \cos(n\omega_0 t)dt=1$ and $\int_{-T_0/2}^{+T_0/2} \delta(t) \sin(n\omega_0 t)=0$?
- Understanding Book Proof that $[-2 \pi i x f(x)]^{\wedge}(\xi) = {d \over d\xi} \widehat{f}(\xi)$
- Proving the sharper form of the Lebesgue Differentiation Theorem
- Exercise $10$ of Chapter $4$ in Fourier Analysis by Stein & Shakarchi
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Is $x(t) = \sin(3t) + \cos\left({2\over3}t\right) + \cos(\pi t)$ periodic?
- Translation of the work of Gauss where the fast Fourier transform algorithm first appeared
Related Questions in FOURIER-TRANSFORM
- Proof of Fourier transform of cos$2\pi ft$
- Find the convergence of series of a sequence of functions in $L^2(\mathbb{R})$
- solving a simple ODE with Fourier transform
- How can we prove that $e^{-jωn}$ converges at $0$ while n -> infinity?
- Show that a periodic function $f(t)$ with period $T$ can be written as $ f(t) = f_T (t) \star \frac{1}{T} \text{comb}\bigg(\frac{t}{T}\bigg) $
- Taking the Discrete Inverse Fourier Transform of a Continuous Forward Transform
- Arcsin of a number greater than one
- Complex numbers in programming
- Power spectrum of field over an arbitrarily-shaped country
- Computing an inverse Fourier Transform / Solving the free particle Schrödinger equation with a gaussian wave packet as initial condition
Related Questions in GREENS-FUNCTION
- Why can Laplace’s Equation have a Green’s Function?
- How do I sum Green's functions to get an approximate solution?
- Who did develop the transfer function formalism?
- Green's function on Riemann surfaces of $\partial_{\bar z}$
- Could anyone help me to solve the following differential equation?
- Finding Greens Function using the delta function
- Find the Green's function $G(\mathbf{x},\xi)$, such that $\nabla^2G = \delta(\mathbf{x}-\xi)$
- Green function for high order Laplacian
- Using Green's function to solve 2d laplace equation
- Green kernel for Dirichlet problem of Stokes flow PDE's $\nabla p = \Delta\vec{v}, \nabla\cdot\vec{v}=0$ on a sphere
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It's partially just arbitrary convention, but it becomes a somewhat more significant thing in the context of special relativity. There, the proper "dot product" between a frequency and vector has the sign-flip on the time component. That is to say, when it's just space, you have $$k = (k_x,k_y,k_z)$$ $$x = (x_x,x_y,x_Z)$$ and work with $$x\cdot k = k_x x_x + k_y x_y + k_z x_z$$ in your Fourier transform. When you use special relativity, you want the proper time with the time counting negative, or
$$k = (k_t,k_x,k_y,k_z)$$ $$x = (x_t,x_x,x_y,x_Z)$$ and then use $$x\cdot k = k_x x_x + k_y x_y + k_z x_z - k_t x_t $$
So when you do a Fourier transform only in time and ignore the spatial components, this negative time convention can emerge. Of course it doesn't matter in a relativity-ignoring situation, but the convention can bleed over!