Let $\pi:(M,g)\to(N,h)$ be a Riemannian submersion (that is, $\pi$ is a submersion satisfying $g|_{\ker(d\pi)^\perp}=\pi^*h|_{\ker(d\pi)^\perp}$). Each fiber of $\pi$ is a Riemannian submanifold of $M$, given by $(F_y,g_y):=\left(\pi^{-1}(y),g|_{\pi^{-1}(y)}\right)$. In the case that $\pi$ is a canonical projection on a Riemannian product manifold, and $f\in C^\infty_cM$ is a compactly supported smooth function, we can write Fubini's formula suggestively as $$ \int_Mf(x)d\mu_g(x)=\int_N\left(\int_{F_y}f(x)d\mu_{g_y}(x)\right)d\mu_h(y) $$ Where $\mu_g$ is the measure on $M$ induced by $g$, etc. Intuitively, it seems that this formula also should hold for a general Riemannian submersion $\pi$, but it is not so clear how to show this. $M$ need not look like a Riemannian product space, even locally, since $\ker(d\pi)^\perp$ need not be integrable. As a result, $g$ does not decompose nicely in adapted coordinates, making a direct computation difficult. I suspect there's a more straightforward geometrical argument, or a simple counterexample that I'm missing.
2026-03-29 12:31:59.1774787519
Fubini's formula on fibered Riemannian manifolds.
645 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in DIFFERENTIAL-GEOMETRY
- Smooth Principal Bundle from continuous transition functions?
- Compute Thom and Euler class
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- Alternative definition for characteristic foliation of a surface
- Studying regular space curves when restricted to two differentiable functions
- What kind of curvature does a cylinder have?
- A new type of curvature multivector for surfaces?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- Show that two isometries induce the same linear mapping
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
Related Questions in RIEMANNIAN-GEOMETRY
- What is the correct formula for the Ricci curvature of a warped manifold?
- How to show that extension of linear connection commutes with contraction.
- geodesic of infinite length without self-intersections
- Levi-Civita-connection of an embedded submanifold is induced by the orthogonal projection of the Levi-Civita-connection of the original manifold
- Geodesically convex neighborhoods
- The induced Riemannian metric is not smooth on the diagonal
- Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic notions of Harmonic maps.
- Equivalence of different "balls" in Riemannian manifold.
- Why is the index of a harmonic map finite?
- A closed manifold of negative Ricci curvature has no conformal vector fields
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-MEASURE-THEORY
- Lipschitz continuous function whose derivative is not continuous almost everywhere
- Relative volume of $\delta$-fattening (neighborhood) of a compact set
- Surface Area in $R^n$
- Excess of Caccioppoli sets
- What type of measure is this?
- Lipschitz extension of affine function to whole space
- Is it true $\mu (A+B) = \mu (A) + \mu(B) $ for bounded sets $ A, B \subset R $
- The Lebesgue measure as energy minimizer?
- Caratheodory's construction
- Upper Bounding Hausdorff Measure
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It seems that the missing piece was was the use of an adapted orthonormal coframe (thanks to Ted Shifrin's suggestion) and a version of Fubini's theorem for differential forms, described in this answer. Let $\nu$ be an $n$-form on $N$, and $\mu$ be an $(m-n)$-form on $M$ (with both smooth and $\mu$ compactly supported). With suitable choices of orientation, we have $$ \int_M\pi^*\nu\wedge\mu=\int_N\left(\int_{\pi^{-1}(y)}\mu\right)\nu(y) $$ This can be shown straightforwardly by working on adapted local coordinates (and the hypotheses can be weakened significantly, but that isn't needed here).
We can w.l.o.g. consider the case where $\operatorname{supp}(f)$ is contained in the domain $U\subseteq M$ of a local adapted orthonormal frame $e^1,\cdots,e^m$, where $e^i=\pi^*(\widetilde{e}^i)$, and $\widetilde{e}^1,\cdots,\widetilde{e}^n$ are a local orthonormal frame on $\pi(U)\subseteq N$. Using the shorthand $e^{k\cdots l}:=e^k\wedge\cdots\wedge e^l$, and choosing appropriate orientations, we can write the integral in terms of these frames. \begin{align*} \int_Uf(x)d\mu_g(x)=&\int_Uf(x)e^{1\cdots m}(x) \\ =&\int_U\pi^*\left(\widetilde{e}^{1\cdots n}(x)\right)\wedge\left(f(x)e^{(n+1)\cdots m}(x)\right) \end{align*} This expression can be Fubinated, yielding the desired result. \begin{align*} =&\int_{\pi(U)}\left(\int_{U\cap F_y}f(x)e^{(n+1)\cdots n}(x)\right)\widetilde{e}^{1\cdots n}(y) \\ =&\int_{N}\left(\int_{F_y}f(x)d\mu_{g_y}(x)\right)d\mu_h(y) \\ \end{align*}