I am junior in this field and am self-studying the algebraic geometry by the following lecture:
http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~moraru/764AlgebraicSets.pdf
I met some problems:
Consider the polynomial ring $k[x_1,\ldots,x_n]$
- (On p.5's Remark) "A polynomial over a field can only have finitely many roots." Does this only hold when $k$ is a finite field with $n\in \mathbb{N}$?
(1.2.9 Example) "The Zariski topology on $\mathbb{A}^n$ is Hausdorff if and only if $k$ is finite, in which case it is identical to the discrete topology." My question is:
a. $k$ is finite here means number of elements in $k$ are finitely many? Like $\mathbb{N}$ is a finite field and $\mathbb{R}$ is infinite field?b. Can anyone please show me a simple example to illustrate this? I am particularly confused about how to find the disjoint neighborhood?
(p.3 ~ p.4 Hilbert basis theorem) If $k$ is Notherian, does this imply $k$ is finite and Zariski topology on $\mathbb{A}^n$ is Hausdorff?
To see that $\Bbb A^n$ is Hausdorff when $k$ is finite, note first that the discrete topology is always Hausdorff (every set is both open and closed, so you can take $\{x\}$ and $\{y\}$ as disjoint neighborhoods of $x$ and $y$ ($x\neq y$)). Now, $V((x_1 - a_1,\dots, x_n - a_n)) = \{(a_1,\dots, a_n)\}\subseteq\Bbb A^n$, so all points are closed. But now $\Bbb A^n$ itself is finite, so any subset $S\subseteq\Bbb A^n$ is finite. You have $S = \bigcup_{x\in S}\{x\}$, and this is a finite union of closed sets (hence closed), so any subset of $\Bbb A^n$ is closed (and thus any subset is open). A proof that $k$ infinite implies $\Bbb A^n$ is not Hausdorff can be found in Georges' answer here.