$f(x)$ is a differentiable function satisfying the following conditions: $$ 0 < f(x) < 1 \quad \text{for all $x$ on the interval $0 \le x \le 1$.} \\ 0 < f'(x) < 1 \quad \text{for all $x$ on the interval $0 \le x \le 1$.} $$ How many solutions does the equation $$ \underbrace{f(f(f( \ldots f}_{2016~\text{times}}(x) \ldots) =x $$ have on the interval $0\leq x\leq 1$?
This seems to be looking like chain rule And since $f'$ is positive on the interval $[0,1]$ it seems to be increasing what does it do for $x>1$? And what is the significance of 2016? I dont think that matters. The function is composed within itself that many times but I think maybe it doesnt matter if its 2016 or 2019 !
Since $f'(x)>0$ for all $x$ in the concerned interval, $f(x)$ is strictly increasing.
So:
$x<y \implies f(x)<f(y)$
(assuming $x,y \in [0,1]$)
Now, suppose for some $a \in [0,1],f(a) \ne a$.
Then, either $f(a)<a$ or $f(a)>a$.
Looking at the first case and using the fact that $f$ is strictly increasing and, crucially, that $f$ maps from $[0,1]$ back into $[0,1]$, $f(f(a))<f(a)$. Of course, by the initial assumption, $f(a)<a$, so now we get $f(f(a))<a$. We can apply this reasoning again $-f(f(f(a)))<f(a)$, but also, $f(a)<a$, so $f(f(f(a)))<a$. But if we repeat this line of reasoning an extra $2013$ times, we get that $f^{\circ 2016}(a)<a$.
This contradicts our requirement that $f^{\circ 2016}$ fix all of $[0,1]$ so $f(a) \nless a$ for all $a \in [0,1]$.
We can reason analogously for the case where $f(a)$ is assumed to be $>a$, ruling it as an impossibility.
So $f(x)=x$ for all $x \in [0,1]$.
But this contradicts the requirement that $f'(x)<1$ for all $0<x<1$, so no solution exists.