I think I understand this some what, but still kinda confused. Let $A$ be a $^*$-algebra and $\varphi$ be a functional on $A$. My professor defined positive functional as $\varphi(x^*x) \geq 0$. From this functional we can define a function $$\langle x, y \rangle_\varphi = \varphi(y^*x)$$I know that I can show that this is a semi-inner product. Then I can define $\mathcal{N}_\varphi := \{x \in A: \langle x, x \rangle_\varphi = 0\}$. I can show that this is a left ideal for our algebra $A$. Then, they induce an inner product on $A/\mathcal{N}_\varphi$. Would this inner product be $\langle x + \mathcal{N}_\varphi, y + \mathcal{N}_\varphi \rangle := \langle x, y \rangle_\varphi$? Also, I never understood what they mean by the completion? I obviously know that a metric space that is complete means that every cauchy sequence converges. I know that if $A/\mathcal{N}_\varphi$ is complete under our innerproduct norm, then it's a Hilbert space. However, I know that not all the time $A/\mathcal{N}_\varphi$ may not be complete. Sorry if this is obvious since I feel that I understand most of this.
2026-04-02 17:29:04.1775150944
Gelfand-Naimark-Segal construction confused
51 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in OPERATOR-ALGEBRAS
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- hyponormal operators
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Identifying $C(X\times X)$ with $C(X)\otimes C(X)$
- If $A\in\mathcal{L}(E)$, why $\lim\limits_{n\to+\infty}\|A^n\|^{1/n}$ always exists?
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- projective and Haagerup tensor norms
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is $\left\lVert f_U-f_V\right\rVert_{op}\leq \left\lVert U-V\right\rVert_2$ where $f_U = A\mapsto UAU^*$?
Related Questions in C-STAR-ALGEBRAS
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- Given two projections $p,q$ in a C$^{*}$-algebra $E$, find all irreducible representations of $C^{*}(p,q)$
- AF-algebras and K-theory
- How to show range of a projection is an eigenspace.
- Is a $*$-representation $\pi:A\to B(H)$ non-degenerate iff $\overline{\pi(A) B(H)} = B(H)$?
- Spectral theorem for inductive limits of $C^*$-Algebras
- Examples of unbounded approximate units in $C^*$-algebras
- Is there a way to describe these compactifications algebraically?
- Projections in C*-algebras
- Homogeneous C*-algebras
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Everything you say is fine. And yes, the inner product in the quotient is defined by taking the inner product of two representatives.
A metric space will usually not be complete, but it can be completed.
Since the metric you are using is induced by the inner product, it is easy to show that the inner product is bi-continuous and hence it extends to the completion. Now you have a complete inner product space, hence a Hilbert space.