We say that a set $X$ is dense into another one $X'$ if for any $x$ $\in$ $X'$ there exists a sequence $x_n$ that is in $X$ such that $$\lim\limits_{n\to \infty}x_n=x$$ we say that a set $X$ is compactly embedded into $Y$ if from any uniformly bounded sequence $x_n$ of $X$ one can extract a subsequence $x_{\varphi(n)}$ that converges in $Y$. Finally a set $X$ is said to be continuously embedded into $Y$ if $$\|x\|_Y\leq \|x\|_X$$ whenever $x$ belongs to $X$. Now, the question is: is there any general method or even a set of several methods to postulate whether a space is dense into another or not, continuously embedded or not compactly embedded or not?
2026-03-25 12:48:58.1774442938
General method to prove density, continuous and compact embedding of space into another
570 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GENERAL-TOPOLOGY
- Is every non-locally compact metric space totally disconnected?
- Let X be a topological space and let A be a subset of X
- Continuity, preimage of an open set of $\mathbb R^2$
- Question on minimizing the infimum distance of a point from a non compact set
- Is hedgehog of countable spininess separable space?
- Nonclosed set in $ \mathbb{R}^2 $
- I cannot understand that $\mathfrak{O} := \{\{\}, \{1\}, \{1, 2\}, \{3\}, \{1, 3\}, \{1, 2, 3\}\}$ is a topology on the set $\{1, 2, 3\}$.
- If for every continuous function $\phi$, the function $\phi \circ f$ is continuous, then $f$ is continuous.
- Defining a homotopy on an annulus
- Triangle inequality for metric space where the metric is angles between vectors
Related Questions in FUNCTIONAL-ANALYSIS
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- Prove or disprove the following inequality
- Unbounded linear operator, projection from graph not open
- $\| (I-T)^{-1}|_{\ker(I-T)^\perp} \| \geq 1$ for all compact operator $T$ in an infinite dimensional Hilbert space
- Elementary question on continuity and locally square integrability of a function
- Bijection between $\Delta(A)$ and $\mathrm{Max}(A)$
- Exercise 1.105 of Megginson's "An Introduction to Banach Space Theory"
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
Related Questions in COMPACT-OPERATORS
- Cuntz-Krieger algebra as crossed product
- The space $D(A^\infty)$
- Weakly sequentially continuous maps
- Operator in Hilbert space and its inverse
- Operators with infinite rank and kernel
- $AB$ is compact iff $BA$ is
- Does this imply compactness
- Existence of $v$,$\lvert\lvert v \rvert\rvert = 1$, such that $\langle Tv, Tv \rangle = \lvert\lvert T \rvert \rvert^2$
- Is $\lim_{n\to \infty} L {\varphi_n} = L \lim_{n\to \infty} {\varphi_n}$ for $L=I-A$ where $A$ is compact?
- Is it possible to construct a compact operator $A$ such that all polynomials of degree $1$ are in the nullspace of $I-A$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
One typical pattern of events is that we start with a "small" space $D$ (e.g., test functions), and consider its completions $H^s$ with respect to norms $|\cdot|_s$, where $|\cdot|_s\le |\cdot|_t$ for $s<t$. Then $D$ is dense in every $H^s$, by construction, $H^t$ imbeds continuously in $H^s$ for $t>s$, and since $D$ is dense in $H^s$, certainly $H^t$ is dense in $H^s$.
Proof of compactness of $H^t\to H^s$ is more delicate, and is less widely true than the previous. Often, when it does hold, such as with the Hilbert-space Sobolev spaces on the circle, it's because $H^s$ and $H^t$ have a common orthogonal basis (e.g., exponentials), and the identity map can be examined explicitly as a map $\ell^2\to \ell^2$ by multiplication by a sequence of reals $\mu_n$. When the $\mu_n$'s go to $0$, the map is compact.